Proks have dynamin like molecules!

i-db39de50e5a8869ab9bf56dd0b50a0b9-dynamin.jpg
When I was a grad student, eukaryotes had all the neatest toys ... actin, microtubules, kinesins, dynein, myosin, dynamin, SNAREs ...

OK that's not totally true - bacteria had their version of tubulin (the constituent of microtubules), and it's called FtsZ. Then others found that bacteria had a version of actin, the most known is called MreB. The latest is that prokaryotes have dynamin. (Click here for previous dynamin entries.)

From the paper:

Given the presence of large GTPases with predicted dynamin-like domain organization in many members of the Eubacteria such as E. coli and Bacillus subtilis, it is likely that bacterial dynamins, or BDLPs as we term this class, are not restricted to cyanobacteria. Such observation, combined with our results, suggests a bacterial ancestry for the dynamin superfamily.

And yes, it forms radial tubes in vitro.

And yes, it also it tubulates membranes in vitro.

And yes, they have a crystal structure.

And yes, it's totally cool.

Ref:
Harry H. Low and Jan Löwe
A bacterial dynamin-like protein
Nature advance online publication 22 November 2006 doi:10.1038/nature05312

PS: What's next? Will we find that proks have membrane trafficking?

More like this

Well in a previous entry I wrote: Generally, prokaryotes are devoid of membrane-bound organelles (including the nucleus, mitochondria, the endoplasmic reticulum), and their cytoskeletal systems are quite simple. And I got a comment about magnetosomes, small membrane bound organelles found in…
I guess prokaryotes are looking more and more like eukaryotes. It turns out that their DNA is moved around by cytoskeletal filaments. The most recent (and one of the most dramatic) examples can be seen in a recent article in G&D where Fogel and Waldor describe how ParAI polymers yank the DNA…
The Cytoskeleton. Now that's what you call a misnomer. It is one of the most fascinating, yet misunderstood, macromolecular assemblies of the cell. Yes, the cytoskeleton can act as a scafold onto which the rest of the cell is drapped (so to speak), but in reality the cytoskeleton is a dynamic…
OK sorry for the lack of updates. I've been rereading lots of mlp literature. Mlp = myosin like proteins. These are found on nucleoplasmic face of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) and seem to filter what goes out of the nucleus, specifically unspliced mRNA precursors. It's old data so I won't go over…

Well in a way they do have membrane trafficking. We work on magnetosome organelles which have their own unique set of proteins. There are also other membranous organelles in bacteria that are likely to have their own subset of proteins.

By magnetman (not verified) on 29 Nov 2006 #permalink

Magnetman thanks for bringing that up. I've written about magnetosomes in the past and they're really neat.

If you look at the IF (or GFP?) images in the paper, BDLP form puncta reminiscent of clathrin coated pits. Most probably the dynamins are responsible for some sort of gross membrane fission and fusion as in mitochondria and chloroplasts (the later being related to the cyanobacteria used in this study). But perhaps there is more membrane trafficking in proks than we currently think and as you suggest magnetosomes may be representative of this.

This is another great story from Jan Lowe's lab. Bacteria are amazing. I still would argue that magnetosomes aren't true organelle but that is just symantics.

Alex, I know about that post, that's how I found your blog and became a regular reader.

BTM, they are not vesicles and have an opening to the periplasm (but so does the nucleus if you want to get technical). but they are membrane enclosed, with unique proteins and have a specified function. In fact the magnetosome membrane exists even in the absence of the magnetite crystals that it produces. The only reason to not call them organelles is that they are not eukaryotic. But then again some eukaryotes have magnetosome-like structures. And some prokaryotes (like the Planctomycetes) seem to ahve a true nuclear membrane.

By magnetman (not verified) on 29 Nov 2006 #permalink

Magnetman, no worries, I know it is a delicate semantics game that is played here. For years ribosomes were considered organelles. I'm curious where you do your research.

BTM, I'm at Berkeley now.

By magnetman (not verified) on 30 Nov 2006 #permalink

Ahh, you have given yourself away. You would be the expert in this I suppose so I'll defer to your experience. I have discussed this story with the other authors on the recent work which is where I get my perspective. Great stuff.