178 Republicans oppose "celebrating the role of mothers"

In Kansas, it was a party line vote:

Nay KS-1 Moran, Jerry [R]
Aye KS-2 Boyda, Nancy [D]
Aye KS-3 Moore, Dennis [D]
Nay KS-4 Tiahrt, Todd [R]

The bill, HR 1113, is a nonbinding resolution "celebrating the role of mothers in the United States and supporting the goals and ideals of Mother’s Day." The vote was on a motion to send the bill back for reconsideration and revision in committee.

Tiahrt rose in protest, demanding first the vote on his motion to recommit, and requesting that the votes be recorded, because "because I’m sure every member wants their mother to know that they have supported the goals of Mother’s Day." He then joined his colleagues in voting against the measure.

I'm sure Donald Betts will have fun with this.

More like this

Believe it or not, on Wednesday, 177 Republicans disagreed that "the House of Representatives celebrates the role of mothers in the United States and supports the goals and ideals of Mother’s Day" this following a 412-0 vote in favor (H.Res 1113). Flip-floppers! Why do they hate mothers so? Next…
The COMPETES Act renewal, which would provide additional funding for scientific research and education, and is targeted towards technological development and commercialization was dealt a blow yesterday as Republicans pulled more obstructionist crap. Before the Republican Party was completely…
As I mentioned previously, the Senate passed the Specter-Harkin Amendment. The House of Representatives is our next target to ensure the Bush's anti-science budget is improved upon. The Genetics Society of America has done an excellent job keeping its members up to date on these political goings…
Often unwatched by all but policy-wonks yet key to determining policies put forth by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), are the EPA’s Scientific Advisory Boards. These boards consult with the EPA on the science that influences regulations, particularly on individual chemicals – science…

"HR 1113", when plugged into the "Legislation in Current Congress" search field at http://thomas.loc.gov/, leads to the "Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Enhancement Act", which most unAmericanly has nothing to say about motherhood.

By Pierce R. Butler (not verified) on 09 May 2008 #permalink

Aha: the correct search term is "H.RES.1113" ...

Stirring and inspiring legislative eloquence for our troubled times!

By Pierce R. Butler (not verified) on 09 May 2008 #permalink

The vote was on a motion to send the bill back for reconsideration and revision in committee.

Actually, no. Tiahrt had just moved to reconsider, i.e., have a "do-over," and this vote was to set aside his motion to reconsider. (BTW, he did vote for the resolution--only people voting with the winning side can move to reconsider.) It's hardly surprising he and his fellow Republicans would vote against an attempt to stop his motion. From what had gone on before that day, his motion to reconsider was obviously just a parliamentary stalling tactic.

I have ideas and voronoff genes.