-
"Here is a picture of (I think) Maru the cat playing in a bag. He loves bags.
Here is the same picture of Maru, at half the size:
Now imagine that Maru is a physicist and the pictures are not pictures but instead windows into the universe he occupies, separate from ours with (possibly) its own unique set of physical laws. The only difference between the two universes is that one has the lengths of everything reduced by a factor of 2.
Can the parallel versions of Maru tell which universe they're in - the smaller or the larger? "
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Clive Thompson on Why We Should Learn the Language of Data | Magazine
"Statistics is hard. But that's not just an issue of individual understanding; it's also becoming one of the nation's biggest political problems. We live in a world where the thorniest policy issues increasingly boil down to…
Once again, you, my readers, have come through with some really high-grade crackpottery. This one was actually sent to me by its author, but I didn't really look at it until several readers sent me the same link because they thought it was my kind of material. With your recommendations, I took a…
Physics Buzz: 490 billion nanometers tall
"There are seven SI base units: meter (m), kilogram (kg), second (s), ampere (A), kelvin (K), mole (mol), and candela (cd). The other SI units are derived from these seven: acceleration is m/s^2, density is kg/m^3, magnetic field strength is A/m, etc.…
The Virtuosi: Would a laser gun recoil?
"Let's motivate our question a little bit. I've wondered about this question since I saw star wars. Though I'm no firearms expert, the recoil in guns must come from conservation of momentum principles. Momentum is conserved in a system. The gun starts…
Yeah, good catch and for some reason I love to see cats nosing into bags. (Note the smooth video repeat.) I'll repeat the comment I left there with tiny changes, it's food for thought (and apparently none of the typos I've been leaving in many comments all over lately, jumping around too much):
I accept the basic point about the relational nature of dimension-holding constants in general. However: it is pretty clear that G can be decoupled from other factors and could reasonably and observably vary with respect to other constants. Think: if "G were half the current value" we can indeed imagine other things, all of atomic physics etc. just being the same, but for example gravity at Earth's surface (well, supposing it kept it's same diameter given slight relaxing effect) would be half of current value, and so on. So the purist approach to the idea is misleading, isn't it?