Jen McCreight is running an online poll to determine the most influential female atheist of the year.
Uh-oh. You'd think she'd learn.
But given that the results will be utterly meaningless, it's still useful — there's quite a long list of good XX godless folk, and commenters keep mentioning more that were left out. Go there to see the depth and diversity of atheism, even if you don't vote.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Uh-oh. Reed Cartwright asks specifically that we don't game this poll, but doesn't having me link to it automatically bias the results? Well maybe not. It's a poll to vote on your favorite geological specimen in a small set of photos. There's nothing there that could selectively stir the godless…
The Ms magazine blog has an awful little article on the New Atheists that completely misses the point. It's about the sexes and atheism, of course, but it has little to say except to whine that the New Atheism is just like the old religion, and gosh, look at all those Old White Guys in the fore.…
I told you all to not vote for me in that poll looking for the most influential female atheist of 2009, but you just had to go and disobey me. The photo at that link is photoshopped, I swear; I'm sure I'd be more bosomy.
However, one good thing has come out of it. Jen has compiled a good (but still…
This is your last gasp on the topic of the proper way to make a sexual advance. I'm just going to wrap up a few dangling bits.
Jen has slammed Richard Dawkins for some comments here. I can confirm that those comments were actually from Richard Dawkins. I also have to say that I agree with Jen and…