A change in plans

After brooding for an unnecessarily long time over a temporary title for the book project last week, I've decided to scrap The Pulse of Life as a contender. As my wife pointed out, it sounds like the title of a school filmstrip, and I wasn't very happy with all the vitalistic baggage that came along with it.

I have instead formulated a title that (I think) comes closer to the gestalt of the book I'm working on. Unless something better springs to mind, I am going to call it Life's Sublime Riddle.

If for no other reason to keep track of my own thoughts, I will briefly recount how I came up with the title. In doing a little research on the debates between Daniel Dennett and Stephen Jay Gould in the 1990's, I stumbled upon H. Allen Orr's review of Darwin's Dangerous Idea. The review was prefaced with a quote by Ernst Haeckel, from his Generelle Morphologie, which read;

Evolution is henceforth the magic word by which we shall solve all the riddles that surround us.

I fixated upon the word "riddle," seeing evolution not necessarily as a solution (although it can be one) but as a riddle itself. You see, a riddle is more than just a vexing question; it is something meant to intellectually challenge and tax the person trying to solve it. Indeed, even though it is abundantly clear that life evolved and that natural selection plays a central role in driving that evolution, there are still evolutionary riddles to solve.

Life's Riddle sounded a bit plain, though. I plucked "splendid" as an adjective at first, for solving the riddles of evolution is a rewarding and fascinating task, but then the title became too close an approximation to the title of Peter Bowler's book, Life's Splendid Drama (which is, in turn, lifted from the works of William Diller Matthew). Making use of the thesaurus, I tried to find another word that might fit, and "sublime" seemed to be what I was looking for. Using "sublime" rather than "splendid" makes it a little more clear that "life's riddle" is something that is awe-inspiring, not just interesting.

My only lament is that I have not had the time to work more on the book itself. Between bustling from work to class to home, I have had little time to sit down and write. I hope to continue my progress tonight, but my other responsibilities either leave me no time or no energy to continue my work. Indeed, so far it is apparent that I am ill-adapted to this semester's schedule, but there is little I can do other than try to get through it.

More like this

During his 1876 tour of the United States, the famed anatomist and popularizer of science Thomas Henry Huxley stopped to see the American paleontologist O.C. Marsh at Yale. Marsh provided his esteemed guest with access to his ever-growing stores in the Peabody Museum, showing Huxley toothed…
The lack of a proper title for my book (latest update here) has continued to vex me, even as I have made quite a bit of progress in fleshing out the chapters. A title is not necessary to my work at this stage, of course, but I feel that having a title helps keeps the voice of the book coherent. I…
In a review in PLoS Biology Axel Meyer discusses a new book by Sander Gliboff on the history of evolutionary biology in Germany following the publication of On the Origin of Species. While many are familiar with evolutionary biologist Ernst Haeckel, few may know about the scientist who is…
As regular readers may (or may not) have noticed I have not been posting many updates about my book, still tentatively titled Life's Splendid Riddle, lately. The primary reason for that is because other projects have taken up much of my time, but it can also be frustrating trying to find something…

Ah, book titles!

Gordon Kane came up with what'll be the perfect title for the book about the LHC when it gets written: The Why Machine. (Although the Calvin and Hobbes fan in me insists that the word "stupendous" has to fit in there somewhere.) I have a couple other titles percolating in my head right now, but I probably shouldn't talk about them just yet. . . .

Good luck on surviving the semester.

Blake; But first you have to complete the work of Issac Asimov, of course.

John; I don't believe I have adopted monism, but I'll leave future historians of science to argue about it if they like ;)

Unless something better springs to mind, I am going to call it 'Life's Sublime Riddle.'

Hmmm... I think you've got the right idea, Brian, but this version just doesn't flow to my ear. How about something like "A Riddle Sublime," with a subtitle that works in both "evolution" and "life"? Something like "Unraveling the History of Life?"

Also, being a geek and a big Tolkien fan, one of the first associations I have with the word "riddle" is the Riddle-game between Bilbo Baggins and Gollum in The Hobbit. How about a title of "Riddling with Nature," subtitle "Solving the Puzzles of Evolution"?

By wolfwalker (not verified) on 24 Sep 2008 #permalink

In light of your apparent wish to present evolutionary biology as multiple interconnected threads rather than a single central narrative, I was wondering whether to suggest you call your book The Greatest Show on Earth.

You might have to work "evolution" in there depending on what publisher you go with. My former advisor's book is called "The Evolution of Modern Humans in Africa" because her publisher wanted "evolution" in the title so that creationists would find it in book searches.

Sorry, your title sounds too much like Gould for me; Life's little joke, and all that. 'Riddle' also suggests artificiality, i.e. the action of a designer, so I'd avoid it. I'd be more enticed by a reference to Hieronymus Bosch's Garden of Earthly Delights, which would also call for some great cover art. 'Earthly' implying naturalism and referencing the geological record, and the weird triptych portraying a riot of diversity with no central director but lots of independent actors, a bit of creepy predation and stuff going on...

By John Scanlon FCD (not verified) on 25 Sep 2008 #permalink