1. christinaslisrant
  2. Rant on: Partners, they say. We’re in this together, they say. Then stab you in the back.

Rant on: Partners, they say. We’re in this together, they say. Then stab you in the back.

By cpikas on August 24, 2009.

i-1d5e6fa4db0abe6c369f8bd51508524e-weste-mail_thumb.png In case you can't read this screenshot of an e-mail (source, via), I'll quote it for you:

"Are you on a first name basis with the librarian? If so, chances are, you're spending too much time at the library. What you need is fast, reliable research you can access right in your office. An all it takes is West(tr)."

This is so much B.S. glasses and all. West, is of course, part of Thomson Reuters (the real evil empire is revealed) and they and Reed Elsevier's Lexis-Nexis divide up most of the legal information money.

Chemistry vendors are known for trying an end-run around the librarian, but usually they're a bit more slick. This is just so wrong - particularly when they market how they'll help you raise your visibility and make your ROI clear in your organization.

Update 8/26: But wait, there's more. Eli Edwards mentions other recent issues with West. First they cut off free printing services to Puerto Rico (they have since reinstated) and then they refused to participate in AALL's price list. Bravo to AALL for refusing sponsorship from West.

Tags
Publishing

More like this

For-Profit Scientific Publishers and the Culture of Entitlement.
I used to have a hard time explaining the anger, resentment, and hostility that many scientists feel toward the big academic publishing houses. It's been getting easier, though. Recent events have, unfortunately, provided people with an experience that makes it easier to relate to what the…
The Need for Moonbat Welfare
Susan Madrak is dead on target: if the rightwing is willing to give its wingnuts cushy jobs (also known as 'wingnut welfare'), why can't the left provide its own moonbat welfare for leftwing moonbats? As Madrak writes: Someone from either the Democratic party or some liberal organization showed…
Around the Web: Research Works Act, Elsevier boycott & FRPAA (Updated!)
This post has superseded my two previous link collection posts here and here. The first focused solely on the Research Works Act, the second added posts on the Elsevier boycott and this one also incorporates posts on the reintroduction of The Federal Research Public Access Act. These three…
Elsevier steals, then copyrights other people's free stuff
Reed Elsevier caught copying my content without my permission: I was not asked for, and did not give, permission for my work to appear on that page, much less in that format. Needless to say, I felt a little slighted. The website in question appears to be a custom version of the LexisNexis search…

...

I've always been on a first name basis with all my librarians. it makes it so much easier when you want to find something, or need help with research...

It's a nice apology but I can't help wondering if it's the library/librarian relationship managers who are sorry and maybe not the rest of the corporation. Thanks for providing the link.

So... West thinks this will help them against, say, RECAP and other crowdsourced legal material? Really?

Idiots. They're cutting off their own nose to spite their face. Without the law librarians, the lawyers will cut 'em off in a red-hot minute to save costs.

A librarian here at MPOW remembers when DIALOG decided they would market to the end user and changed all of their stuff to reflect this new policy. Heh. well that didn't work out as planned, either!

Hint to West: Attorneys don't have time to read ads or listen to your marketing pitches. If you want to get your foot in the door, you have to market to the librarians. Congratulations on alienating the people who make the purchasing decisions.