Microbes as glass sculptures: in a word, beautiful.

Dear Luke,

I just saw a photo of your glass sculpture of HIV.
I can't stop looking at it. Knowing that millions of those guys are in me, and will be a part of me for the rest of my life. Your sculpture, even as a photo, has made HIV much more real for me than any photo or illustration I've ever seen. It's a very odd feeling seeing my enemy, and the eventual likely cause of my death, and finding it so beautiful.

Thankyou.

The above is letter inspired by some glass sculptures delicately created by Luke Jerram. They are spectacular, and I'm pretty sure you don't need to be a science junkie to appreciate the prettiness of what you see. The letter, in many ways, demonstrates that there is utility in exploring the boundaries of science and art. Here is the one for HIV.

i-e2bbcac761bf1bbc28c807e71b841a11-HIV.jpg

This artistic project actually has a fairly academic perspective behind it, as described on Luke's website:

These transparent glass sculptures were created to contemplate the global impact of each disease and to consider how the artificial colouring of scientific imagery affects our understanding of phenomena. Jerram is exploring the tension between the artworks' beauty and what they represent, their impact on humanity.

The question of pseudo-colouring in biomedicine and its use for science communicative purposes, is a vast and complex subject. If some images are coloured for scientific purposes, and others altered simply for aesthetic reasons, how can a viewer tell the difference? How many people believe viruses are brightly coloured? Are there any colour conventions and what kind of 'presence' do pseudocoloured images have that 'naturally' coloured specimens don't? How does the choice of different colours affect their reception?

Anyway, certain worth exploring further. Below are some more images of these marvelous sculptures, and you can even see youtube video of Luke preparing one at his site.

This is e.coli;

i-b6518a9e11af890f62c55624cea443d4-ecoli.jpg

Smallpox;

i-86d060d7302ee4fc5403c96382562c6c-smallpox.jpg

SARS;

i-086d8c946c38bd06454ecbb4e8e048f1-SARS.jpg

Swine Flu;

i-f2139bca4cd8e786737bae8915d27b80-swineflu.jpg

More like this

Dinner inside the belly of Iguanodon. My fellow scibling Jonah Lehrer has a new piece in SEED extending the argument from the end of his book Proust Was a Neuroscientist called "The Future of Science... Is Art?" It's pretty interesting, exploring the relation between physics and neuroscience to…
Entangled, 2010 handbuilt porcelain, cone 6 glaze Kate MacDowell sculpts partially dissected frogs, decaying bodies with exposed skeletons, and viscera invaded by tentacles or ants. It's the imagery of nightmares, death metal music videos, or that tunnel scene in the original Willy Wonka (not a…
[First posted on 1/20/05 at the old blog] With all the controversy surrounding the issues in my last few posts, I thought it would be refreshing to talk about something completely uncontroversial: the existence of universals in art based on neurological mechanisms. (That was a joke, people). I've…
This weekend I visited the Trauma exhibition at London's GV Art gallery. The pieces all relate in some way to physical and psychological trauma inflicted on the body, by a range of artists working alone and in collaboration with medics. Some of the items are underwhelming verging on irritating…

Wow, those are stunning. I guess I'm developing a weird thing for glass biology. I went to see the glass flowers of Harvard recently and was completely mesmerized.

Those are kinda pretty, but personally I prefer the plushie ones ^__^

By Katherine (not verified) on 14 Sep 2009 #permalink