Here's an update from a previous post about James Sherley, at MIT, who'd threatened late last year to go on a hunger strike to protest not getting tenure.
According to this story yesterday at ABC News (and, I now see, as also noted by Omnbrain), the guy is going through with it. Speculation following from my earlier post was that he'd either not do it, that it was strange to wait until now to start, or that there was more to it than we knew. I still don't know anymore about the case, and honestly forgot about it. But there he is, going through with it.
I wonder if anyone can help us, by now, get beyond the speculation. What are the merits of his case? If more than the news has so far reported?
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Here's the latest of the intermittent updates (I actually skipped one, but I'll come back to it on a slow day one of these days) from my friend Paul, who's working as a journalist in Baghdad (and, thankfully, just about done with his tour there). This is one of the most opinionated of the…
It might have been Serendipity - we happened to be driving by, just Eric and I on our brief solo trip. Or it might have been the survey ribbons that went up across the road a few weeks ago - the suggestion that our neighbors who have been building a 5000 square foot house with a special dog-…
Note: 1 1/2 feet of snow so far and still falling - we may get more than three by the end (the words "in the higher elevations" are generally the ones you want to listen to when forecasts are made for my area). Power so far, but not expecting it to last. Smaller dog must boing around in snow to…
Some of you may know that a publisher contacted me last year about turning a piece of short fiction I'd written from an adult perspective into a young adult novel. There are several reasons I wanted to do this - the first is that in many ways, the young adult fiction market is much more vital than…
Read this from the MIT Tech (school paper) then decide:
http://www-tech.mit.edu/V127/N1/1facultyopn.html
Nobody is against Sherley having tenure if he is the man for the job. It was never racial with him. His science if flawed, his science is bad and he is strident. Do we have others here who can attest to him standing up at meetings and causing problems from the audience. Only to be boo-ed out of the room?
Race never had anything to do with it and bullying MIT into a tenure position and acting 5 about it only proves he was never the man for the job.
Period.
Well, that stuff gives me the creeps. It's enough to make me seriously wonder what's going on there at MIT. Especially the part about denying that he was the first faculty member hired into BE. It just reminds me all too much of Ellen Swallow Richards, and how the chemical engineering department refused to grant her the PhD, even though she'd done all the work, because they just couldn't stand to have their first ever PhD go to a woman. Also how, though she was the first woman admitted to MIT, it was with the understanding that her admission did not set a precendent for the admission of women. "Professor Sherley, here is your BE appointment letter. Except please do not take this to mean that you are the first ever professor appointed into BE." Ah, there's nothing like MIT tradition. Gotta love my alma mater.