Hollywood Physics (and the Society for Arts, Literature, and Science)

This is but a link to an interesting summary article about the topic of scientists (physicists) in film. It's by Sidney Perkowitz, who teaches at Emory, and who I've seen speak at the meetings of and know has long been involved with the Society for Literature, Science, and the Arts (SLSA) -- which I call Salsa, but not sure if anyone else does, and which was long called just the Society for Literature and Science (SLS) until a name change a few years ago.

Salsa has a highly respected journal, too, Configurations, which is often fairly theoretically inclined and generally tip top. In fact, while I'm here, let me give a link to their next annual meeting, which is this November in New York: "EVOLUTION: BIOLOGICAL, CULTURAL, AND COSMIC," since it seems to be on the mark for many of the folks here at Scienceblogs. (Lynn Margulis is the keynote speaker.)

In any case, back to the link at hand: the lead to the link says:

From the 1902 production Voyage to the Moon to the recent What the #$*! Do We (K)now!?, physics has appeared in numerous feature films. Sidney Perkowitz examines the accuracy of physics in the movies and asks how realistically physicists are portrayed on screen

More like this

It's an embarrassment of riches on ScienceBlogs today. Below, your quick guide to a few of the posts that are making us feel so flush. Benjamin Cohen at The World's Fair links to an article about the portrayal of physicists in film, and talks up the Society for Arts, Literature, and Science, which…
While they are often not the sort of films to win Oscars, science fiction movies have been around for nearly as long as there have been moving pictures, and Hollywood continues to pump out tales about time-traveling cyborgs, alien encounters, and man-made disasters. Sidney Perkowitz's new book,…
Michael Moore is in a class by himself when it comes to generating news attention, advance publicity, and box office for his documentary films. For example, when I was in Canada this past week, I picked up the National Post to read a lead front page story defending capitalism against Michael Moore…
For some reason, I was forwarded a link to an old article from the Chronicle of Higher Education about how to give a scholarly lecture. (It's a time-limited email link, so look quickly.) As with roughly 90% of all Chronicle pieces, it's aimed squarely at the humanities types. The advice given thus…

Oh, the conference is Nov 9-12.

Funny, I have next to me an old article: "Script Doctors" by M.Z.Ribalow, The Sciences, Nov/Dec 1998, p.26-31., about the portrayal of scientists in movies.

(thanks for the correction coturnix -- wheover comes to the link next will be none the wiser for my error. and the ruse goes on: i've never made an error.)