"The Von Trapp Children Speak to a Geneticist" Piece

Despite the recurring theme of rejection with many of the pieces I submit, I find you still get the sense that you were (nevertheless) in good hands. In other words, you'd like to think that the editors who take the time to read your material and then leave generally ambiguous statements about your work, are not saying "no" without good reason. It certainly makes you feel all the more special when something does make the grade.

In some respects, I think my first accepted piece at McSweeney's (The Von Trapp Children Speak to a Geneticist) is a good example of this. It was fun to write, and it just seem so wonderfully tidy how each child's personality led to a pertinent yet somewhat controversial question. More to the point, the editor (John Warner) apart from saying "yes" to the effort, was actually responsible for (what I feel) is the funniest line in final edit of the piece. Take a look below and I think you'll agree. Credit should be given where credit is deserved, right?

i-bd2d7ffb0bd3d33c87b31819097a730a-vontrapp.gif

More like this

(This is an old slide I used for one of my genetics classes - the general idea about what Grimace is exactly was pilfered from a graphic design school advertisement I saw where several presumably student's works were showcased. if you happen to know who the student was that originally designed it…
Here is a selection of some of the writing I've done - Dave. "True Encounters in my Research Career", The Walrus, September 2007 (with Chris Hutsul). (commented upon at The World's Fair) "The Reason Is Math Bush Edit", Science Creative Quarterly, September 5, 2007 "Analyses of the Six Degrees of…
Those of us who publish technical research papers like to see our work cited by our colleagues. Indeed, it's integral to one's success as a researcher (whatever 'success' means) that others cite your work, in whatever context. You might not like to see the publication of a stinging attack that…
My high school buddy James Grimmelmann unleashes on Newsweek: Tony Dokoupil manages to write 1,200 words in Newsweek about professional psychics without once telling his readers the single most relevant fact: Psychic powers don’t exist. Would Newsweek run an interview with the Easter Bunny? Would…

LOUISA: Why doesn't anybody remember who I am?

GENETICIST: Alas, it appears that this is because you are the second child..."

Hey, wasn't Louisa the third child?

By ThePolynomial (not verified) on 10 Jul 2006 #permalink

You know, you may be right. Although I could perhaps chalk it up to an added subtle jab with the joke. You don't get copy editors for these sorts of things.