Naturopaths getting it wrong in Canada

Over at Skeptic North there has been an ongoing discussion about naturopathy. Since it looks like naturopaths are going to get prescribing privileges in Ontario, it's reasonable to subject their practice to some pretty intense scrutiny. One naturopath left some interesting comments about treatment of heart disease, citing relevant literature, but failed to show an actual understanding of the clinical realities of treating heart disease. This is not surprising given that naturopaths aren't required to do residencies like real doctors are.

Another comment referenced the Canadian Association of Naturopathic Doctors (CAND) information statement on swine flu (the original was apparently pulled down by CAND. Here is a copy). Its idiocy was downright surreal. It read like a fifth grader's poorly done book report. It is not only incorrect, but internally inconsistent. For example:

There is no research that can predict who is at risk and who is not.

Followed by:

The following groups are considered to be more at risk from the current H1N1 virus...

They also list "naturopathic" prevention strategies which include hygiene such as hand washing and avoiding sick people. What's "naturopathic" about that?

And it wouldn't really be crappy medical advice without recommending "boosting the immune system", in this case with stretching, "dry skin brushing", and other nonsense. Without a shred of irony, they mention that mortality due to this flu may be tied to an "over-reaction" of the immune system.

For a comparison, take a look at some actual medical sites.

The only mention of vaccination in the CAND document is in a negative context. The other documents recognize that the H1N1 flu vaccine is the most effective way to prevent infection. This is an inexcusable failure on the part of CAND.

And just for laughs, if you're interested in virology, their introductory paragraph on the putative origins of the current pandemic is completely wrong.

This patient information document betrays a complete lack of understanding of science and medicine and adds to the already considerable evidence that naturopaths shouldn't be allowed to lay their hands (clinically) on anyone---ever.

Categories

More like this

As we mentioned earlier this week, a brouhaha has erupted north of the border (or just a bit east for our Detroit-area colleagues) whereby graduates of Canada's two naturopathy schools may be given drug prescribing rights by the Ontario legislature. Editor-in-chief of the Skeptic North blog, Steve…
Two weeks ago, Canadian Skeptics United published on their Skeptic North site a piece by an Ontario pharmacist criticizing a proposal by the province to grant limited prescribing rights to naturopaths. The essay, which was reprinted in the National Post on Tuesday, outlines the intellectual and…
Orac gets fan mail. Yes, as hard as it is to believe, my blog sometimes ticks certain people off, and sometimes I even hear from them. For instance, last week a reader wrote me. The subject header read, "Why do you hate naturopathic physicians so much?" and the letter went something like this (OK,…
Naturopathy is quackery. That can't be said often enough. After all, any "discipline" that not only incorporates homeopathy as a major part of its training but also requires that its graduates pass a test with a section on homeopathy certainly can't be considered science-based. Actually, to be more…

Though I don't live in Ontario, I do live in Canada, so I e-mailed Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty as well as the premiers of the opposition Conservative and New Democratic parties to register my disappointment and distress about this bill. Seems like the least I could do.

This sentence was rich just because of the botched punctuation:

The H1N1 influenza virus has not mutated between the first and second wave indicating that it will, in all likelihood remain a mild to moderate disease.

Ugh. They would have been best without any comma. If they are going to put a comma there, they need one after likelihood. Which is fine, people have trouble with commas, but because of the phrasing here, I initially parsed it like this: "The H1N1 influenza virus has not mutated between the first and second wave, indicating that it will [mutate]." heh...

And of course, the co-opting of legitimate preventative strategies and then calling them "naturopathic" is really annoying.

Hmm, only 2 comments? I guess no one cares.

By DrWonderful (not verified) on 14 Dec 2009 #permalink

Dr. Wonderful? More like "Dr" troll...

By MitoScientist (not verified) on 14 Dec 2009 #permalink

ugh. It feels like we're hitting a science low-point with our PM actually wanting to to lower emission standards, and our premier wanting to lower health and medical standards. Makes you wonder if they're holding a grudge against their grade school science teachers.

By Daniel J. Andrews (not verified) on 14 Dec 2009 #permalink

Per: "[naturopaths'] complete lack of understanding of science and medicine [...] naturopaths shouldn't be allowed to lay their hands (clinically) on anyone -- ever."

My internal history with naturopathy is completely consistent.

-r.c.

It feels like we're hitting a science low-point

It's probably due to all the US-American immigrants you got during the Bush administration lowering science standards. Beware of immigrants from the south...

Dr.Wonderless,
just because you don't care about Canadian legislation giving charlatans prescribing rights and it's dangerous repercussions on health care doesn't mean nobody does.

Besides, 2 articles on the subject in a national newspaper and published online resulted in 120+ comments in a 24h comment period limit, averaging 1 comment every 5-15mins. How d'you figure that one?;)

For those wanting to read those posts:

from Scott Garuva (RPh), arguing against ND prescribing:
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/11/24…

From two NDs, arguing for:
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/11/27…

This last post got owned from the many comments...quite an entertaining read...

Dianne: STFU. Seriously.

Dominionists? In my medical science? It's more likely than you think!

But not just dominionists. You will find a coalition of Moonies, Scientologists, and dominionists all working together to inject supernaturalism into systems of social authority around the globe.

Poor Discovery Institute. High school biology teachers proved a tough nut to crack. However on the healthcare front, Bravewell and the toxin busters have made great strides.

Wait, you say. Moonies, Scientologists, and Dominionists have profound theological differences. No way they can work together.

Well have a look at OT VIIs John Coale and Greta Van Susteren. They've become quite palsy with everyone's favorite dominionist, Sarah Palin.

But Scientologists don't believe in Jesus, so how does that work?

LOL. A true believer must survive many trials and tests of faith before ascending to the innermost circle where the greatest secrets are revealed. Holy revelation will destroy any initiate not properly prepared to receive it.

But I will share a little secret with you, dear PalMD readers:

Travel a spiritual path to the holiest of holies at the center of any cult and you will encounter the exact same amazing revelation. The same. I kid you not. And once enlightened, you'll find that working with Masters outside your faith is no problemo.

Every member of the Council for National Policy has faced the holy of holies and learned the great secret.

Now, can you guess it for yourself?

By Anonymous (not verified) on 15 Dec 2009 #permalink

Did you read the Wikipedia?

I'm curious to read Stephen Harper's "controversial" address to the group in 1997, if anyone can find a link.

If you were wondering why Mitt Romney's favorite book is some drek by L Ron Hubbard, well, know you know.

This group has alligned with the right but would switch sides faster than you can say, "Joe Leiberman" if that would further its utopian ambition.

By Anonymouse (not verified) on 15 Dec 2009 #permalink

Dr Wonderful

Not wonderful, not a doctor.

By antipodean (not verified) on 16 Dec 2009 #permalink

Dr.Wonderful
just because you don't seem to care much about Canadian legislation on the dangerous repercussions of ND prescribing on our health care doesn't mean no one does.

The National Post published 2 articles on the subject and were later posted online in their blog. The blog posts resulted in 120+ comments in a 24-hr period limit, averaging 1 comment every 5-15min. How's that for public interest? ;)

For those curious about those posts, here they are:
1)arguing against ND prescribing, Scott Garuva (RPh)
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/11/24…

2)arguing for, two NDs
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/11/27…

This last post has great arguments against ND prescribing...good read for CAM skeptics.

well how bout that

Affiliate Marketing is a performance based sales technique used by companies to expand their reach into the internet at low costs. This commission based program allows affiliate marketers to place ads on their websites or other advertising efforts such as email distribution in exchange for payment of a small commission when a sale results.

www.onlineuniversalwork.com

Work at home jobs can be hard to trust. That's why we research and publish only the best of the best... carefully pre-screened, 100% scam-free work at home jobs you can depend on. No get rich quick schemes. No scams. Just 100% real work at home jobs
www.onlineuniversalwork.com

By kiramatali shah (not verified) on 05 Feb 2010 #permalink