What is epigenetics?

I think understanding the basics of inheritance is pretty easy for most people - the traits of parents are passed down from parents to offspring. Simple! Humans have known and exploited this fact for thousands of years. When Gregor Mendel came along, he meticulously worked out some mathematical rules for inheritance in peas, and we now know that these rules work (more or less) from plants, to ants to elephants, and we know the molecular basis lies in the replication and transmission of DNA.

There's far more nuance than you learn in basic biology, of course. Most visible traits aren't governed by a single gene the way Mendel saw in his peas. Even human eye color - which is often touted as an easy one to understand - is polygenic. And of course there are characteristics that are heavily influenced by the environment. But still, heritable traits depend on genes, and genes are made of DNA, and the way DNA is divided up and passed on to offspring more or less follows the rules Mendel worked out over a hundred years ago.

That is, until we start talking about epigenetics, which is all kinds of confusing.

So where to start?

You could try your hand at this recent nature article. It's behind a paywall, but that's probably a good thing. I can barely penetrate the jargon, and I'm a biologist:

The cells in a multicellular organism have nominally identical DNA sequences (and therefore the same genetic instruction sets), yet maintain different terminal phenotypes. This nongenetic cellular memory, which records developmental and environmental cues (and alternative cell states in unicellular organisms), is the basis of epi-(above)-genetics.

Barf.

You could check out wikipedia, but I'm not sure they're much better:

In biology, and specifically genetics, epigenetics is the study of inherited changes in phenotype (appearance) or gene expression caused by mechanisms other than changes in the underlying DNA sequence, hence the name epi- (Greek: εÏί- over, above) -genetics. These changes may remain through cell divisions for the remainder of the cell's life and may also last for multiple generations. However, there is no change in the underlying DNA sequence of the organism;[1] instead, non-genetic factors cause the organism's genes to behave (or "express themselves") differently.

Get it? Me neither. To be fair the wikipedia entry has a lot of information, and it's about as well written as an encyclopedia article could be on a topic this complex, but if you don't have a background in biology, I don't know that it would get you very far.

If it's written information you're looking for, I think you're far better off reading ERV or PZ or Carl Zimmer. But, if you want a totally basic intro, that doesn't presume any prior knowledge, and you prefer curling up in front of a TV or computer to reading a multi-page article, then check out the recent lecture from Science in the News!

It's basic, but entertaining, and I learned some sweet stuff too. Enjoy!

2010 Fall Lecture 3.1: You Are What Your Mother Ate: The New Science of Epigenetics from Science in the News on Vimeo.

Part 2: Epigenetics and Us

Part 3: Epigenetics - Past, Present, and Future

More like this

Climate Change Odds Much Worse Than Thought: The most comprehensive modeling yet carried out on the likelihood of how much hotter the Earth's climate will get in this century shows that without rapid and massive action, the problem will be about twice as severe as previously estimated six years ago…
This talk has me a little concerned: it's proposing something rather radical, for which Arber is going to have to show me some unambiguous evidence to convince me, and I'm coming into it with a very skeptical mindset. Here's the relevant portion of his abstract: The theory of molecular evolution…
When Wilhelm Johannsen coined the word "gene" back in 1909 (hmmm, less than two years until the Centennial), the word was quite unambiguous - it meant "a unit of heredity". Its material basis, while widely speculated on, was immaterial for its usefulness as a concept. It could have been tiny…
Over at Uncertain Principles, Chad writes: He [Dawkins] rubs me the wrong way when he talks about science (I wish I could find the old post somebody on ScienceBlogs did about the vapidity of the whole "meme" thing), and really gets up my nose when he talks about religion. I don't know if he's…

This is a fascinating idea. I am currently a high school student and I have a brother that is studying his PhD in some advanced field of biology. I get lost in his language just as the language that you have presented. The video did help allot however. In school we just learn the very basics of genetics and just skim the surface of what there is out there. This is of course because of the limited time we have in school and the vast amount of information we have to cover in biology. Your article makes me want to dig deeper into this field, the thoughts of the environment of the developing child altering the child might change the thoughts of our country. I hope that we finally can understand that what we put into our mouths directly relates to how healthy we are. If getting healthy isnât enough of an incentive I hope that people will do it for their children.

I would like to suggest this paper:

EPIGENETICS IN MIND
The body's tendency to silence the expression of one parental allele in favor of the other -- a phenomenon known as genomic imprinting -- is much more widespread in the brain than scientists have believed, according to a new genome-wide study in mice. Surprisingly, more than 1300 genes expressed in the mouse brain appear to exhibit "parent-of-origin" epigenetic effects.

http://dialeticsofdisorder.blogspot.com/search?q=genetics