The Stimulus - How much is marked for science funding?

From the AAAS:

The three agencies highlighted in the America COMPETES Act of 2007 and President Bush's American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI) would do extremely well in the stimulus appropriations bill. The National Science Foundation (NSF) would receive $3.0 billion; the Department of Energy's Office of Science (DOE OS) would receive $2.0 billion; and Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) would receive $520 million; nearly all of these supplementals are for R&D activities. The $5.5 billion allocated to these three agencies would finally put all three budgets on track to double over the next 7 to 10 years as envisioned in the ACI, America COMPETES, and Obama campaign promises.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) would receive $3.9 billion in the stimulus appropriations bill, divided roughly evenly between research and infrastructure (construction and maintenance of facilities). The stimulus funding would turn around a NIH budget that has been in decline since 2004. The Department of Energy's (DOE) energy programs would also be a winner with $2.0 billion for R&D and related activities in renewable energy and energy conservation, with billions more for DOE in weatherization, loan guarantee, and clean energy demonstration funds. And the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) would receive $600 million, mostly for R&D.

Let's not mess things up this time! The last major increase to the NIH caused major problems years later. Money was simply pumped into new and existing grants, PIs hired many new grad students and postdocs, and the pyramid scheme got a major influx bloating the bottom of the academic edifice. As the bottom rose, many chunks fell of and as one Nobel Lauriate stated, we sacrificed a generation of scientists.

So what to do? President Obama has stated that we should "triple the number of fellowships in science to help spur the next generation of innovation". But as I pointed out yesterday, NIH funded labs must also change the way postdocs are treated. This can be done quite simply by

  • Increasing the wage guidlines issued by the NIH
  • Increasing funding for career postdocs

Let's see what happens.

(ht: Andrea D'Ambrogio)

More like this

The American Physical Society has sent out another of its email alerts encouraging people to write to Congress in support of more funding for science. Actually, they're urging people to send two messages: a thank-you to Speaker Pelosi for the generous science funding in the House stimulus bill, and…
As Science reports, the big news this week is that Congress passed a bill that adopts almost all of the recommendations of the 2005 National Academies report Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America. The bill was signed this morning by President Bush. The unprecedented…
Mad about the funding cuts in science? Why not send an letter to those responsible? Taken from an letter just sent out to members of the American Physical Society: From: Arthur Bienenstock, President, the American Physical Society To: Members of the American Physical Society Re: Federal Funding…
Over at SEA they have a point-by-point description of the Senate economic stimulus bill. Obviously what is actually passed will be sorted out in conference committee but here is what is included about science: Science: National Science Foundation (NSF) Research: $1.2 billion total for NSF…