1. transcript
  2. Let's talk about facts this election - Part V - Science Funding

Let's talk about facts this election - Part V - Science Funding

By apalazzo on August 30, 2008.

And I won't even talk about the whole Global Warming issue. Governmental funding of science is fundamentally important to our economic future.

First let's look at funding for the National Institutes of Health, the main source of money for biomedical research in the US:

i-8ea064c9702f42bd4dced5c7e6a339de-NIH_Funding.jpg

Joseph j7uy5 @ Corpus Callosum points out:

I can't help but notice that the funding leveled off the same year that the Iraq War started.

How about the Physical Sciences, Engineering, Math & Computer Sciences? They have all flat-lined since GWB came to power:

i-207b2844f52ebe7b7997942355d469d8-NYT_budgets.gif

On the biggest issues of our time, energy, the story is no better. Money for alternative energy research has been flat through both Democrat and Republican Administrations. You would think that after 9/11 there would be a push for this type of research. Here's the data:

i-250d59ba5e9feedd7e2daed3a21cee7f-energy.jpg

One of the most ambitious ideas is to develop fusion power, but is it being done in the US? Try Southern France. So if our future relies on a strong support for Science, who do you trust?

Tags
Election '08

More like this

The John Droz Letter
The following is a repost of a Facebook Post by Michael Mann. I don’t think this needs any comment from me. The original is here. Begin Repost Several colleagues have notified me of the following email that has been sent to a presumably broad group of researchers and academics by John Droz of…
Obama takes a science test
The folks at ScienceDebate2008 pushed hard during the primaries to have the candidates address science policy. Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum from Scienceblogs The Intersection were among the leaders in this movement. They didn't succeed in getting a debate then, but now with the field down to…
Joint Statements on Climate Change from National Academies of Science Around the World
National academies of sciences from around the world have published formal statements and declarations acknowledging the state of climate science, the fact that climate is changing, the compelling evidence that humans are responsible, and the need to debate and implement strategies to reduce…
Everything Senator Ted Cruz said about climate change in this NPR interview was wrong.
On December 9th, National Public Radio broadcast an interview between NPR’s Steve Inskeep and Senator Ted Cruz on the subject of climate change. Below is an annotated transcript of that interview with my [bracketed] responses to the consistently false scientific claims made by Senator Cruz.…

The USA is a partner in ITER. Because it such an expensive and complicated it's better to built just one together than compete.

Sure we're helping, but we are not the leader. We first pulled out of ITER then rejoined. I've touched on this before.

The energy R&D numbers are an absolute disgrace. I can understand flat funding for biomed, etc., due to the war (although I strenuously disagree). I cannot understand for the life of me the failure to drive hard for energy R&D expenditures.

One way to interpret all of these posts is that you care so much because you have decided to stay in the US... shall we expect news sometime soon??