One thing I never understood about US colleges is the amount of money pumped into their sports teams. It's an open invitation to wasted resources and (in worse case scenarios) corruption.
College Sports Get a WarningThe National Collegiate Athletic Association's enthusiasm for fighting corruption in college sports is partly driven by the fear of federal intervention. That fear came a step closer to being realized last month, when the House Ways and Means Committee fired off a tough-minded letter demanding that the N.C.A.A. explain how profit-seeking, win-at-all-cost athletic departments operate on campus.
The letter showed that Congress has noticed the recruiting violations and the athletes who sometimes remain eligible to play without progressing or by attending bogus classes. It also implied that the N.C.A.A. might eventually lose its tax exemptions unless it forces athletic departments to conform more closely to an educational mission.
The N.C.A.A. president, Myles Brand, defended the group's reform effort and reaffirmed his commitment to holding athletic programs to higher standards. But an N.C.A.A. report released last week touches on some of the same issues cited in the blistering letter from Congress. The problem is that athletic departments have more influence on university affairs than they should. They often use that influence to undermine the institutional mission.
Run by celebrity coaches who can earn more than $1 million a year -- and supported by adoring fans, boosters and trustees -- the campus sports machines easily overshadow the college faculties and presidents, some of whom seem frankly fearful of speaking up about abuses. The athletic departments derive much of their power from the widespread but mistaken belief that they pay their own way, and even earn money for their universities, through television revenues and other sources.
The truth, laid out in recent reports, is quite to the contrary. Only a handful of high-end college sports programs earn more than they spend. Among the rest, many struggle to balance their budgets and can do so only through subsidies from their universities. Sports budgets are growing two to three times faster than higher education as a whole.
The N.C.A.A. report calls on college presidents and administrators to rein in the campus sports machines and dial back spending. But the facts suggest that many college administrations have been outflanked by athletic departments that are deeply invested in the bad old ways. If that doesn't change, the N.C.A.A. can expect more scrutiny from Congress.
- Log in to post comments
"One thing I never understood about US colleges is the amount of money pumped into their sports teams. It's an open invitation to wasted resources and (in worse case scenarios) corruption"
You've got it backwards - the reason the sports programs are prone to corruption is not that the colleges push money into them, but rather they are huge sources of cash for the universities. There are 10's of millions of dollars generated by large mens football and basketball programs(each). This money supports womens and minor sports at these schools and leads to lots of Alumni donations. Its really mini-pro teams with the athletes payed a pittance relative to the revenue, but I don't know any "solution" - don't really know if is a problem that any cash rich environment doesn't have.
Let me re-emphasize one paragraph:
Alex, I believe the reasoning (if you can call it that) on the part of the universities (or their boards of trustees) is not that the sports programs in themselves bring money in, but rather more that they contribute to a sort of alumni "be true to your school" super-loyalty that results in more alumni donations.
At least, that is what I have been told.
Whether or not this is true, . . .
Money is pumped like water in US Colleges and which leads to corruptions having said that I believe USA has produced some quality players in all sports games