This will be my last entry on this topic (i.e. the World Cup) ... c'est fini après ça. Here is Zidane's interview:
For all those of you that don't understand le français, I'll translate a couple of things ...
He was first asked if there was bad blood between the two teams, any insults being thrown about. Zidane says that there wasn't anything too bad, there's always a lot of tension but nothing that doesn't usually go on in a big game. He never had any problems with anyone of the Italian players, not even Materazzi. Then they switch to the incident, Zidane says, that nothing had happened between the two players until this point, Materazzi grabbed his shirt, Zidane told him to stop, that if he really wanted his shirt they could swap them at the end of the game. Then Materazzi says some harsh words (des mots qui sont tres dur) and repeats them several times. Zidane explains that these words are harder then any action, and offended him very deeply. He then reacted. The interviewer asks him for the exact words, Zidane refuses to tell, it's very personal, things to do with his mother his sister. Very harsh words,
you hear them once, you just leave, like I was doing, you hear them twice and ... you hear it three times and I am un homme avant tout (hard to translate without changing connotations, along the lines of a man after all but not so macho). There are words that are so harsh that I'd rather take a punch to the face. And so I reacted.
...
This is not an action that anyone should ever do, I want to say this very forcefully. It was seen by 2 to 3 billion spectators and millions of kids, and to them, their parents, and teachers I say that I'm sorry.
Then Zidane is asked if he regrets what he did. Zidane answers that he can't regret his actions because it means that Materazzi was right. (I don't get that) He again excuses himself to everyone especially all the kids and their parents, because his actions are not actions that anyone should tolerate. But not reacting would be the equivalent of agreeing that Materazzi had the right to say what he said. When asked if he would have performed the same actions again, Zidane answers that he's already explained himself.
Then ref stuff, FIFA blah blah blah. Zidane interrupts the interviewer and says
We always talk of actions. Only the action, or in this case the reaction, is punished. But without a provocation there cannot be a reaction. The one who provokes is guilty, I feel very strongly about this, and I will defend this position, becuse we should end this practice of only giving sanctions to those who react. Do you think that at the end of the World Cup, with 10 minutes left in my career, I wanted to do something like this? Do you think that it gives me any pleasure? No I was provoked, with harsh words. Now I tell you that my actions can't be forgiven, all I am saying is that we should be punishing those that provoke.
Zidane recounts what happened with the ref ... he then ends it by saying that the most important point is that his own actions are not forgivable, and that to all the kids out there, he's sorry. He has kids of his own and he would never want them to be exposed to that. It's important that kids stick up for themselves, but it's more important for them to try to avoid such situations. He thanks all of football and all the French supporters.
OK enough soccer. After all, there are more important things going on, like the tragedy in Mumbai (but I'll refrain from writing about that as I'm not an expert). Tomorrow we tackle the Golgi and some aspects of mRNA metabolism.
- Log in to post comments
Second interview:
http://www.eurosport.fr/football/coupedumonde/2006/sport_sto924199.shtml
(Click on the video)
This is an interesting twist.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/13/AR20060…
Same topic.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2006/teams/france/51…
Here is another article onr BBC's website: How rife is taunting in football?
Hmm. Here is a different look at the headbutt:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/13/zidane_headbutt_outrage/
An interesting article in Time Magazine: Three Cheers for Butthead.