House Democrats and NY Times Editorial Board Question FDA User Fees

By David Michaels

It is starting to feel like a groundswell. Last week, a group of 22 experts on drug safety and regulation issued an open letter to lawmakers asking Congress not to reauthorize the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), the system that funds the Food and Drug Administrationâs drug review process. In that letter, we wrote âuser fees may appear to save the taxpayers money, but at an unacceptable cost to public health.â

Yesterday, at a House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee hearing, chaired by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) , several members suggested PDUFA should be eliminated. Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO) referenced a public meeting at which four former FDA commissioners agreed that the nation would be better served if Congress directly appropriated the money rather than relying on user fees and the accompanying constraints imposed by PDUFA. And Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), who chairs the appropriations subcommittee that funds the FDA, asserted that the balance between federal funds and user fees must be reconsidered.

The lead editorial in todayâs New York Times also gets it right:

Congress needs to confront another worrisome source of industryâs influence: the $300 million in annual fees paid by pharmaceutical manufacturers that help finance the approval process and regulation of drugs. Critics have long complained that these user fees distort the agencyâs objectivity and make for a too cozy atmosphere between the industry and its regulators.

The Bush administration, unfortunately, is seeking to increase reliance on user fees. Thatâs the wrong direction to go. To ensure that the publicâs interests are its only concern, the F.D.A. should be supported entirely by public funds.

Once you look at this issue, it is hard to escape the conclusion that user fees are part of the problem, not part of the solution to the drug safety crisis. If Congress does not want to give up the $400 million, then have the user fees deposited directly into the US Treasury, and give the FDA enough appropriated dollars to do its job right.

For more information, check out our web page on the link between PDUFA and drug safety.

David Michaels heads the Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy (SKAPP) and is Professor and Associate Chairman in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services.

More like this

By David Michaels In the wake of the debacles involving Vioxx, Ketek, and other dangerous drugs that should never have been approved in the first place, Congress is about to take up reauthorization of the user fee system that funds the Food and Drug Administrationâs drug review process. The system…
When you go to the Department of Motor Vehicles and pay your fee to register your car, are you allowed to negotiate with the DMV as to how the agency will use your fee? Of course not. So why is the drug industry allowed to negotiate with the FDA about how the agency will use the money it collects…
By Susan Wood Next week both the Senate and House are moving forward on legislation to reauthorize the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), along with other key FDA legislation.  The Senate will be âmarking upâ a large omnibus piece of legislation that combines PDUFA with drug safety…
By David Michaels The Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), through which the FDA collects money from drug makers in exchange for faster reviews of their new products, gets skewered again â this time in a piece by Christopher Moraff in the American Prospect Online. (We've been covering the issue…