Shorter Martin Cothran: More evidence for Global Warming:
English winters are cold and snowy, therefore Al Gore is fat global warming is a hoax.
Outside the fictional world of Martin Cothran â where Lost Cause mythology counts as history, as does Noah's Ark â scientifically literate folks know that 2010 is shaping up to be the warmest year on record.
For context, here's the 12-month moving average of global temperatures as of last June:
Note that the last measurement is the warmest 12-month average temperature in recorded history.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
June 2014 was the hottest June on record, and records go back to 1880, by which time Global Warming may have started already but wasn't nearly as intense as the last half of the 20th century, according to data NOAA has released and highlighted. The previous month, May, was the hottest May on record…
It has been said that global warming has stopped over the last several years. Some say it has not been happening for 17 years, some say for ten years, some say for 12 years. Let's test these hypotheses
Hypothesis: June, the most recent month with full data, was an average year, not a warm year.…
We knew October was going to be hot. Only hours ago the Japanese Meteorological Agency came out with their data showing October 2015 to be the hottest October in their database. I've not checked yet to see if it was the hottest month in their database. October 2015 was the hottest month in that…
Global warming is typically measured at the surface, with data from thermometers all across the land areas and sea surface temperatures combined. That isn't the whole story, of course. Much of the added heat, an effect of human generated greenhouse gas pollution, goes into the upper 2,000 meters or…
Rosenau,
Anthropogenic Global Warming is a transparent fraud. Your "data" is mostly fabricated. (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8211948…). We've been through this crap before: eugenics, DDT, global cooling, alar on apples, heterosexual aids, ad nauseam. Scientists periodically turn up the hype to keep the funding flowing.
Just criminals.
Why should anyone take the opinion of someone who signs him/herself as "Anonymous" seriously?
And please, quoting Christopher Booker? Of all people, he is the last source I would trust. A long track record in cherry-picking data, he has.
That is all you have? Pathetic.