Shorter Longer Bill Dembski:
It's wrong to appeal to a judge's authority on federal law, but not to twist Thomas Jefferson's words to pretend we can know what he'd think of modern science.
Dembski is responding to Steven Pinker's reply to Disco. DJ Stephen Meyer's op-ed claiming Thomas Jefferson would totally have totally disagreed with Charles Darwin (who was 15 when Jefferson died). Pinker wonders why the Boston Globe keeps giving creationists op-ed space, even after Judge Jones ruled ID unconstitutional in science class. Dembski:
Is this vapid appeal to authority all the Darwinians have left?
I kid you not.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Blogging will continue to be sporadic around here for a while longer while I struggle to finish up a few projects that for some reason aren't getting finished on their own. In the meantime you can have a look at two letters to the editor in response to the Meyer editorial on which I reported last…
Alas, op-ed's as measured and intelligent as the one from Reiss and White are a comparative rarity in American newspapers. More often we get tripe like this, from ID supporter Stephen Meyer. He writes:
IN THE battle over how to teach evolution in public schools, Thomas Jefferson's demand for a “…
I'm getting too old for this. The idiots keep making the same arguments, over and over again, and they just get dumber with every iteration. Bryan Fischer makes me want to stick an icepick in my brain just to stop the stupidity coming out of his mouth.
His latest article is Defeating Darwin in four…
David Klinghoffer is surprised that his Disco. 'tute colleagues managed to get an article published at the Huffington Post. Klinghoffer's colleague must've known this was coming, and HuffPo isn't notorious for refusing essays, so I can't fathom why it was any sort of surprise. Nor is "pleasant"…
So an appeal to the authority of 150 years of evidence versus an appeal to zero evidence? Hmm! I wonder which appeal most appeals to Dembski and his unappealing ilk?
Now that Pinker has replied to Meyer's piece, and Dembski commented on Pinker's reply, the original op-ed counts as a pro-ID peer-reviewed article, right?
Dembski has truly become a caricature of his former self.
RBH: What was he before?