Ed Felten and Randy Picker [who] point to an interesting ruling from the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals: Because people have a reasonable expectation of privacy when they communicate over e-mail, the court ruled that the government must obtain a search warrant to get your e-mail from your ISP.
The logic of the ruling is the same as the logic behind requiring a warrant for a wiretap or to search a mailed letter or package. Some legal scholars think the ruling is likely to be overturned for technical reasons, but I for one hope the legal reasoning ultimately prevails.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
There's also lots of interesting debate going on around the legal blogosphere concerning Judge Taylor's recent ruling in the NSA lawsuit. Orin Kerr raises some interesting questions in a post at Volokh. He points out something that concerned me as well when I first read the ruling. I was not…
Okay, I looked up the actual 1995 law that was being debated by Congress (you can find much of that information here). Having done so, I have to admit that there's a much stronger case for hypocrisy on the part of the Republicans than the Democrats. The warrantless wiretapping provisions of the…
Uprising Radio reports on an item of social justice:
href="http://uprisingradio.org/home/?p=2134">San Diego
County Searches Welfare Recipients’ Homes
Published on 28 Nov 2007 at 12:06 pm
GUEST: Eric Isaacson, Partner in the law firm,
Coughlin-Stoia, and cooperating attorney with the…
Jordan Lorence, the ADF attorney who wrote the post on judicial activism that I replied to the other day has responded. He doesn't link to the response or mention me at all, but I assume it's my post he's responding to because my post was titled "ADF's Double Talk on Judicial Activism" and his…
I agree that most people expect privacy in their emails. However, the technology has never supported it; email has always been transmitted in clear text, wide open to every machine between its source and its destination. They all copy it, if for no other reason to transmit it. A small but significant portion of email has always been monitored, indexed and databased for various reasons - the portion only being small because there is so much email, and so little of it is of any interest.
The same is largely true of all other unencrypted internet traffic; all of your non-https web browsing can be recorded and databased by any machine between you and the web pages you download.
Making the law match people's expectations would have some advantages, but without widespread use of cross-platform open-source encrypted email, it would mean very little, as the law would be unenforceable.
On the other hand, I don't encrypt my paper mail, and I don't use a scrambler on my telephone. I have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and that's what the Constitution protects.
Or at least, what it's supposed to protect. Since we pretty much know that the NSA was tapping phone calls and reading emails without warrants, principle and practice here are not perfectly aligned, and I agree that the world would be moderately better if more people had pgp-enabled email software. I've got my email set up to handle it, but no one I correspond with signs, let alone encrypts, their mail.