How "Trackback" Works

For those of you are are snickering at how this blogger didn't really understand trackback, a basic feature of blogging, just picture for a moment the all-too-common occurrence of four PhDs struggling at the lecture podium to get the A/V program to work for an esteemed guest speaker.

Well, I've got me one of them thar PhDs. However, a PhD is also supposed to give you license for "life-long learning," not that you really need a PhD to do so, of course.

Example: I try to do my best to cite interesting things I see in the blogosphere, especially those posts from my brilliant and witty friends outside of the ScienceBlogs corral.

But I could never figure how the trackback feature works - ya know down below where folks' blog posts say something like "Blogs that reference this post." You'd think that simply hyperlinking to someone's post would be good enough these days. But my citations never seem to make it to people's trackback sections for that particular post.

But, you would be wrong.

My Learning Moment: I just came across a fabulous, step-by-step example of how to use trackbacks by the blogger, Michael Pusateri, who writes Cruftbox, about the not-so-funny example of a friend's post on his vasectomy. Unfortunately, Michael did not post this on his blog - it's just a separate webpage - so I can't practice trackbacks for this page. However, Michael does have a very short post from 2003, back when most of us were still in the blogging uterus, that refers to this page; hence, I shall practice trackback presently.

The bottom line, from Cruft (the legendary, Michael Pusateri):

1) The purpose of TrackBack is to let a site know that you are referencing them on your on site.
2) The TrackBack URL is different than the regular permanent link URL.
3) TrackBacks are fun. You should use them.

More like this

Here are some ways to define the format/genre/communication channel... etc. I usually go back to Mortensen, Torill and Walker, Jill. (2002). Blogging thoughts: Personal publication as an online research tool. In A. Morrison ed. (Ed.), Researching ICTs in context (1 ed.) (pp. 249). Oslo, Norway:…
Yesterday, PLoS ONE moved to the newest version of the TOPAZ platform. Rich Cave explains all the improvements that this move entails, including the citation download for articles, but one new feature that should really be exciting to bloggers are Trackbacks. From now on, if you link to a PLoS ONE…
Each summer, the fair City of New York plays host to a cosmic convergence of bloggers within the ScienceBlogs.com corral. It's a great time to meet all the folks we know very well online, but perhaps not IRL. Moreover, we had a really nice reader meetup last year where - thank you very much - all…
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of speaking via Skype with Dan Simons's graduate-level science writing class. We talked about the ins and outs of academic blogging, and the nature and ecosystem of science communication online, and the students asked some terrific questions. I had asked Dan to…

Interesting. I was never a big fan of trackbacks myself: it is a much bigger source of spam than comments and a combination of Sitemeter referrals page, Technorati and Google Blogsearch tells you who is linking to you and where the readers are coming from.

I always thought that the habit of trackbacking is something old-timers had to do in the infant age of blogging before those three services were invented and that modern bloggers have no real use for trackbacks any more. How many of the relatively new bloggers care to use them?

As coturnix points out, spam is a HUGE problem with trackbacks, and most sites have abandoned using it for this reason. It's a shame, as the idea was a good one, and I hope that future implementations find some way around the issue.

I started using trackbacks when I first started blogging, but now I find it a huge pain to have to remember to do the trackbacks.

Sometimes though, if I am commenting on the topic of a post I will still do trackbacks. This allows both the original post author and other readers to find out that I am continuing the conversation. I suppose, I could put a link in the comments instead.