Eli has the details.
Coming soon "Addendum: The Warren Commission" - in which they conclude that Kennedy committed suicide.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I thought I'd share a snapshot of my morning with you. For some reason, the internet seems like a good place for it.
The paper promised to be about the evaluation of evidence in understanding the assassination of John F. Kennedy. What follows are the notes I took during the approximately 25…
So, investigation of anthrax terrorism attacks ends up pointing to lead investigator who then commits suicide. All neat and tidy, case closed. But it certainly does not look that simple after all. Check out that DemocracyNow! story for some intriguing details. (watch/listen/read)
Additional and…
Kill Bill and Kung Fu star David Carradine has been found dead in a Bangkok hotel room on Thursday.
Thai police told the BBC the 72-year-old was found by a hotel maid sitting in a wardrobe with a cord around his neck and other parts of his body.
There is no official determination, but the word is…
Actually, the full headline is:
href="http://www.huliq.com/36055/genetic-test-for-suicidal-ideation-in-patients-using-antidepressant-drugs%20">Genetic
test for suicidal ideation in patients using antidepressant drugs.
A company called Neuromark has made available a genetic test that it
claims…
What would be really delicious is if someone wrote up "Addendum: Mission Statement of the Cato Institute" (with the real authors in small print below the big headline) and sent nice glossy offprints to all of Cato's clients.
This just in from the Times of Wattsupistan:
Watts now seems ready to accept the IPCC reports as gospel, as long as they agree with Wikipedis:
WUWT;
Gary says:
October 20, 2012 at 9:09 am
Are you deliberately looking for made up psuedo-facts like the one you suggest ,or actual pieces of real information?
REPLY: It is in the IPCC report. Also on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_forcing
The relationship between carbon dioxide and radiative forcing is logarithmic, and thus increased concentrations have a progressively smaller warming effect.
The same logarithmic formula applies for other greenhouse gases such as methane, N2O or CFCs, with coefficients that can be found e.g. in the IPCC reports.[7]
I’ll look for your apology in the next comment. – Anthony"
[AW is always very keen to get people to apologise for him lying to them. I'm pretty sure that the CFC aren't in the logarithmic part of the conc range - which is part of why they're powerful, per molecule. But I don't think he's very good at, well, the science in any kind of depth - there's just a seizing at a few factoids.
I've corrected wikipedia's error. Now to find out what bozo wrote it in there. Hopefully not me :-) -W]