links for 2009-04-20

  • Sure, it looks like a really good book about physics. But where's the talking dog?
  • "In the physical sciences and physics especially, science follows an infinite loop procedure. I'll label them 1 and 2, though it's really a chicken-and-egg thing. This is the way physics works, simplified:

    1. The experimental results produce data which suggest ways old theories could be refined, replaced, or strengthened.
    2. The new theoretical descriptions and predictions suggest new experiments to test the accuracy of those theories. Go back to step 1.

    And recursively the theories become better and better approximations to reality. Some theories like QED and general relativity are literally perfect as far as we can tell, though most physicists expect that (say) general relativity will eventually require changes at very high energy."

  • "I remember when I was discussing a story about fast-charging batteries with someone that there was the conjecture that this was the hurdle to getting electric cars on the road. And I realized it wasnât â heat dissipation issues aside (charging a cell-phone battery is one thing, but trying to scale that up is quite another) â the real issue is how much energy you need and how quickly you can deliver it. Grid capacity."
  • "The experimental claim, coarsely described, is that after some time, cells containing heavy water under these conditions begin to get hot (but not cells containing ordinary water!). Ideally one does good calorimetry and can measure the amount of energy that comes out of the cell in the form of heat, vs. the amount of energy put in in the form of integrated electrochemical current times voltage. The claim is that in some such experiments, the inferred amount of energy out is much larger than the electrical energy in. This is "excess heat".

    So, what's the problem? Well, there are several issues."

  • "Think of it as a challenge..."
    (tags: math comics silly)
  • "[T]he KSM example seems to put the practical question to rest altogether. If waterboarding was an effective torture technique, why on earth did officials feel the need to administer it 183 times on one individual? What kind of sadist thinks, "We didn't get the information we wanted after torturing him 182 times, but maybe once more will do the trick"?"
Tags

More like this

An emailer sends in a link to a comment on The White Coat Underground. It's in the context of naturopathy, the idea that medical problems ought to be treated with natural means. Some of it's a good idea - eating right, exercising, that sort of thing. Those sort of things aren't going to cure…
YouTube - MST3K - Patrick Swayze Christmas A carol to move the hardest of hearts... (tags: silly music movies television youtube video) Not Even Not Even Wrong - Stephen Hawking's The Grand Design : Built on Facts "Isaac Newton, when he wasn't revolutionizing mathematics and almost single-…
In a Queens Park, Duke Riley Leads a Battle on the Low Seas - NYTimes.com "This was an art exhibition -- a term that perhaps conjures a more subdued event. But the art in this show, called "Those About to Die Salute You," involved humans in motion, boats on water and those tomatoes. It was the…
Creating Citizen Scientists § SEEDMAGAZINE.COM "A few days ago, sitting in my office, I contributed to peer-reviewed scientific research in biology, astronomy, and psychology. Even though I don't hold degrees in any of these fields, my contributions will help advance science: I was doing real…

What kind of sadist thinks, 'We didn't get the information we wanted after torturing him 182 times, but maybe once more will do the trick'?"

The Civil War by 1865 demonstrated the arch stupidity of Napoleonic-era human wave attacks upon rifles (not muskets) firing Minié bullets (not lead shot). We thus have WWI 55 years later, especially the Battle of the Somme. British infantry were ordered to march shoulder to shoulder uphill through barbed wire entanglements into German machine gun fire. Again and again and again. Perhaps the Germans were expected to run out of ammunition.

Waterboarding ditto. Orders were initially issued. Subsequent orders were consistent. Management is about process not product. Through the 1990s corporate America bought IBM even though better PCs could be cobbled together from swap meet parts for 50% the price, then loaded with Compac DOS not MSDOS. "Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM." How many officers have been courtmartialed for waterboarding? They faithfully followed orders - and crap only flows downhill.