Saturday Football

While all right-thinking people know that the important games are played on Sundays, as God intended, there are some people who insist on watching football on Saturday. Yesterday was a particularly good day for it, with a bunch of highly rated teams losing .

While there was, of course, only one actually important result yesterday, namely Williams beating amherst as is right and proper, I like seeing the chaos in the upper echelons of Division I. Personally, I'm rooting for everybody to lose except for Boise State and the University of Exit 9. Not because I particularly like either of those teams, but because continued victories will once again help highlight the way that the current college football system is badly broken.

Neither Rutgers nor Boise State, though both are undefeated, has any chance of playing for the mythical national championship, because neither is a traditional football power. As a result, they weren't ranked in the pre-season polls, and if you're not ranked in the pre-season polls, you're pretty much done. College football only has one round of post-season play, and the "championship" matches the teams with the top rankings according to an arcane formula that includes both polls and computer rankings. And given the only-drop-when-you-lose nature of sports polls, there's no realistic way for a team ranked outside the Top 25 to get a shot at the title.

This is far and away the dumbest method of determining a winner of any major sport-- dumber even than penalty-kick shootouts in soccer, and if the people in charge had any sense, they'd replace it with an actual playoff. That won't happen, though, as the current system is insanely profitable for a small group of traditional football powers, so they have no reason to change it.

So, every year, I root for chaos and confusion in the BCS. I want to see undefeated teams finish just outside the big-name bowls, and be denied a chance to play for the "championship," so that every sports program in the nation is consumed with discussions of just how stupid the current system is. It's only with enough years of embarrassingly unjust "championship" games, and outraged discussion of them, that they'll actually be forced to change the system, and make college football a sport worth watching.

Tags

More like this

Over at Cosmic Variance, Sean has a nice, concise post about what's wrong with college football. He's responding to a desperately stupid post that ends with this: Let's not ruin college football's fabulous 13 week do-or-die regular season with a playoff! This was posted back in October, so the…
Some time back, I offered the right to pick a post topic to anyone who managed to name one of the Physics Nobel laureates for 2006. Tom Renbarger won, and picked his topic: OK, with Midnight Madness on the horizon, I've decided to request a sort of season preview of two (trying to press my…
This past weekend, I ended up hearing sports-radio pinheads holding forth proudly about their ignorance of college basketball. The justification for this is that "the regular season doesn't matter," since the NCAA tournament is single-elimination, and lesser-known teams keep ending up making big…
Over at Inside Higher Ed, they have a piece looking at the state of college football as we enter bowl season. This is dominated by two large tables of numbers, one good, and one bad. The first table is the good one, as it explains why the college football "championship" is so messed up. It lists…

> This is far and away the dumbest method of determining a winner of any major sport

Agreed.

By John Lynch (not verified) on 12 Nov 2006 #permalink

> It's only with enough years of embarrassingly unjust "championship" games,
> and outraged discussion of them, that they'll actually be forced to change
> the system, and make college football a sport worth watching.

really? cuz every year I keep hoping people will realize they have better things to do than watch 19-year-olds who are ostenisbly in college play football and basketball when they should be studying for exams.

:)

I agree completely. One scenario I'm rooting for this year is a OSU/Michigan rematch for the "championship" where the team that lost the first time (hopefully by 10 or 14 points) wins by 3 points or less. Then the "national champs" will have been outscored over 120 minutes of football by the "#2 team".

'One scenario I'm rooting for this year is a OSU/Michigan rematch for the "championship" where the team that lost the first time (hopefully by 10 or 14 points) wins by 3 points or less. Then the "national champs" will have been outscored over 120 minutes of football by the "#2 team".'

One rather stomach-turning variation on this scenario would be Michigan picking off OSU and Notre Dame somehow weaseling their way up to #2, and then edging the Wolverines in the national championship game after U of M beat them by 26 in South Bend.

5 or 6 handoffs to Jehuu Caulcrick in the 4th quarter of the MSU-ND game might have headed this possibility off before it ever started, but if ND beats USC and U of M beats OSU, there isn't too much else that has to happen for a Wolverines-Irish national championship game.

Be careful what you wish for.

By Tom Renbarger (not verified) on 12 Nov 2006 #permalink

The real reason why neither Boise State and Rutgers won't play for the national championship is that neither one plays anybody worth a damn.

I like the current system. It's insane, but it gives people something to argue about.

I agree the current system is crap -- we ought to go back to traditional bowl system that was in place before the BCS. The attempts with the BCS are pretty bad.

That being said, under no proposed playoff system would Tulane their undefeated year or Boise State have been included.