It's Not Science Without Graphs

After months and months of nothing, behold! Signal!

i-975bc9916f238766a2e1d51bcae59726-sm_source_signal.jpg

Explanation below the fold.

What you're looking at here is a graph showing the signal from our optically excited metastable krypton source prototype. The red dots are fluorescence detected by a photomultiplier tube (PMT) from metastable atoms created in the source, and excited by a probe laser passing through the source region. The black dots show the intensity of another beam from the same laser passing through a plasma discharge in a vapor cell, which creates metastbles that absorb the light when the laser is at the right frequency.

The laser frequency is swept back and forth across the atomic transition a few times a second, and the signals from these two beams are recorded on an oscilloscope, so the time axis is really a measure of the frequency. The upward-going peaks in the red trace (at +/- 0.08 s) indicate that atoms in the source are absorbing light from the probe laser and re-emitting it out to the side (where the PMT is). The downward-going peaks in the black trace indicate that atoms in the vapor cell are absorbing light from the laser, and reducing the intensity seen on the photodiode.

The fact that these two signals occur at the same frequency tells us that we're really seeing fluorescence from metastable atoms, and not just some weird glitch in the PMT signal. There's even a hitch in the PMT trace at about +0.1 s that matches the jump in the vapor cell signal, corresponding to a point where the diode laser frequency hopped backwards for an instant.

The PMT trace is very preliminary data, of course. The signal is really small-- you can see the digitization from the oscilloscope-- and it sits on top of a very large background of scattered light. The peaks in the signal are less than one volt high, on top of a five-volt background, which isn't exactly ideal. There are some things we can do to clean up that background, though, and we also have some adjustments we can make to attempt to increase the size of the peaks.

There's a lot of work yet to do, but the important thing is that we have a signal. Now we're doing science, not just plumbing.

Tags

More like this

One of my current thesis students has been plugging away for a while at the project described in the A Week in the Lab series last year, and he's recently been getting some pretty good data. I've spent a little time analyzing the preliminary results (to determine the best method for him to use on…
So, what's the deal with that graph I was talking about the other day? I sort of left it hanging at the end, there, but I ought to actually interpret the figure. It also serves as a nice and fairly simple illustration of how physicists approach experimental data. Here's a newer version of the plot…
The third category in our look at lab apparatus, after vacuum hardware and lasers and optics is the huge collection of electronic gear that we use to control the experiments. I'll borrow the sales term "test and measurement" as a catch-all description, though this is really broader than what you'll…
The penultimate experiment in the Top Eleven brings us up to the first nominee who's still with us.. Who: Rudolf Moessbauer (1929-present) (that's Mössbauer with a heavy-metal ö), a German physicist. (The Wikipedia link is for consistency with the other posts, but contains very little information.…

Congrats again Chad. Paper accepted for publication and first signal. This is turning out to be a good week for you!