"Breathtaking Inanity" Would Be a Great Album Title

I'm probably just about the last science blogger on Earth to note this, but the Dover Panda Trial decision was handed down today, and it's a doozy. I particularly like the summation:


Those who disagree with our holding will likely mark it as the product of an activist judge. If so, they will have erred as this is manifestly not an activist Court. Rather, this case came to us as the result of the activism of an ill-informed faction on a school board, aided by a national public interest law firm eager to find a constitutional test case on ID, who in combination drove the Board to adopt an imprudent and ultimately unconstitutional policy. The breathtaking inanity of the Board's decision is evident when considered against the factual backdrop which has now been fully revealed through this trial. The students, parents, and teachers of the Dover Area School District deserved better than to be dragged into this legal maelstrom, with its resulting utter waste of monetary and personal resources.

That is one pissed-off judge...

You can find lots of good commentary (and the full text of the decision in PDF form) at Dispatches From the Culture Wars-- just keep hitting "next post" for a while.

More like this

Quick post as I have to head out for the day but will post again later... Judge Jones has found for the plaintiffs in Kitzmiller v Dover, holding that ID is not science and that the ID policy violates both the purpose and effect prongs of the Lemon test. See here, here, and here. Legal buffs can…
The conclusion of the ruling is stunning in its clarity and pointedness: The proper application of both the endorsement and Lemon tests to the facts of this case makes it abundantly clear that the Board's ID Policy violates the Establishment Clause. In making this determination, we have addressed…
Judge Rules Against 'Intelligent Design' Initial reaction: what a relief. Once I have a chance to read the decision, I'll have something vaguely more insightful to say... Update: Oy. The decision turns out to be 139 pages. PDF here. Update, 11:30 am: Okay, I've had a chance to give it a quick read…
There is a new interview with Judge Jones in the July/August edition of the Pennsylvania Lawyer. The article is not available online, but I wanted to share some of the more interesting bits. As he did at the close of the trial and many times since, he offered a great deal of praise to the attorneys…