Via Digg, an article on hilarious Google searches. Hmm, reminds me of one I discovered a while back. (Below may or may not be NSFW, depending on your level of puritanism. And it can certainly lead to clicking which is definitely NSFW.)
Why, no Google, you pornography obsessed search engine, that is not what I meant at all.
Update 4/24: Another good physics related google search at Swan's on Tea.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales will launch the OpenSource search engine on January 7th, according to the Washington Post.
You must know that at at any given moment at Google, there are countless technical experts working on tweaking and refining the Google search engine, to the extent that it is a…
Here at SB, we use Google analytics for getting info about how many people are reading our blogs, and how they get here. I also have a SiteMeter monitor on GM/BM. One thing that I get a kick out of is taking a look at my hits, and seeing what kinds of interesting connections come up. Sometimes it'…
I was going to write a series of posts describing each essay in the current Cites & Insights, and still plan to do so.
But this hit me by surprise--a LISNews item pointing to a makeuseof.com post pointing to Blind Search.
Blind Search?
People who care deeply about open web search engines spend…
Look, up in the air, is it a bird? No. Is it a plane? No. Is it the quantum pontiff? Yes! Yes! The Quantum Pontiff! Um, okay....but what exactly is the quantum pontiff? Besides, of course, the juxtaposition of two words which don't often find themselves seated together at the dinner table…
I've made similar mistakes. The google search for "man strftime", for instance, gives about 8 results for unix manual pages relating to various implementations of strftime. The google search for "man date", as I recall, is rather less helpful.
I think everybody in a technical field has probably found some pretty sketch stuff when googling for things related to LaTeX.