By way of Atrios, we discover that Google has moved away from its pro-net neutrality position:
Google Inc. has approached major cable and phone companies that carry Internet traffic with a proposal to create a fast lane for its own content, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. Google has traditionally been one of the loudest advocates of equal network access for all content providers.At risk is a principle known as network neutrality: Cable and phone companies that operate the data pipelines are supposed to treat all traffic the same -- nobody is supposed to jump the line.
I've said this before: this is why we're seeing all of the Fairness Doctrine bullshit. It's purpose is to drive a wedge between the left wing and right wing groups that favor net neutrality. Let me spell it out:
- The Fairness Doctrine forces radio and TV to provide alternative viewpoints--and most progressives and liberals don't want the Fairness Doctrine reimposed.
- 'Forcing' all content to be treated as equal is just like the Fairness Doctrine. If an internet provider wants to favor some material over others, why can't it?
- No more net neutrality.
Is this a fucking stupid argument? Yes. But there are a lot of fucking stupid people out there--and the money helps lubricate the stupidity.
I'm telling you, this is exactly how this argument will play out.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
One of the fights that will have a significant long-term effect on the freedom of the press is over net neutrality. Oddly enough, conservatives, even though, at one point, the political blogosphere was predominantly conservative (no, really, it was), have been shrieking about the Fairness Doctrine…
So much for that "Don't Be Evil" Google bullshit:
Google and Verizon, two leading players in Internet service and content, are nearing an agreement that could allow Verizon to speed some online content to Internet users more quickly if the content's creators are willing to pay for the privilege.…
Michele Bachmann might be the stupidest person who can still breathe.
Do you know what net neutrality is? It is...
...a principle proposed for user access networks participating in the Internet that advocates no restrictions by Internet Service Providers or governments on content, sites, or…
There are so many hot button issues today it's not possible to pick "the" biggest one. But certainly in the top five (unfrtunately there are 100 things in the top 5) must be "net neutrality." Essentially it is whether commercial internet service providers (like Comcast or RCN) should be allowed to…
WSJ is wrong - go to the fray....
Check some of the responses (check all of the links within). WSJ was caught red-handed lying.
And the response to the response....
The stupidity of the fairness doctrine mirrors the stupidity of the practice that is mandated in many publications that a writer should include information and viewpoints about "both sides" of an issue, as if every issue only has 2 sides and that there aren't certain sides that are ludicrous and should not be humored as credible.
But yes, the WSJ lied.
Well, the argument might well play out like Mike said,
but in the meantime, dear readers of this blog, do something about it, like go to
http://www.savetheinternet.com/ ( http://www.freepress.net/ )
and sign their petition!
Perhaps, just perhaps, if enough well-informed people (such as readers of this blog) do complain loudly, Net Neutrality might survive.
(Even with a new administration, one has to watch, and make sure one's voice is heard, and not drowned out by corporate interests.)
I don't seen why Google needs a faster line than anything else. Everything I have used Google for comes up fast enough for me. If I had faster service than DSL, everything would come faster, including Google, but, for me, Google has less of a need for speed than many other sites I utilize.
ı have followed your writing for a long time.really you have given very successful information.
In spite of my english trouale,I am trying to read and understand your writing.
And ı am following frequently.I hope that you will be with us together with much more scharings.
I hope that your success will go on