Starting next week: What it takes to write a pop-sci book

i-d544a6398b9fc7fd4a1eaad59a764f58-book-74-(126711474392.224.38.110)-thumb-110x164-42281.jpg

Long-time readers of this blog know that "Laelaps" is not so much a stand-alone repository of my thoughts and opinions as an active writing lab; from the very beginning I have had bigger things in mind. One of those projects, my book Written in Stone, will be published later this year, and every now and then I have thrown together a few thoughts on what it is like to write a pop-sci book. I am hardly the only science blogger to have gone through this process, though, and starting next week I will be teaming up with two other geoscience writers in an effort to help potential book authors understand what goes into writing a pop-sci book.

Starting on Monday, March 15 David Williams (author of Stories in Stone; blog) and Michael Welland (author of Sand; blog) will be joining me in a discussion about how a pop-sci book goes from an idea to a real dead-tree product on a bookseller's shelf. (We will each post on our own blogs and I will collect the links here.) To kick things off we will discuss on how to identify a "book-worthy" story and what it takes to find a publisher for it, but we also want to hear about what you would like to know. This is meant to be a conversation, not a lecture series, and to make that possible we will need input from others (no matter what stage of the writing process they might be in).Tell us what you would like to know about and we will be sure to cover it.

More like this

The time has come to wrap-up this blog series, but there was one other topic I wanted to cover before concluding; how do you let people know about the mass of ink-blotted, dead tree pulp that is your book? Promoting Written in Stone will be a tough job. When it hits shelves this fall it will…
Earlier this week David Williams (Stories in Stone), Michael Welland (Sand), and I started a blog series about the details of publishing a popular science book (Parts 1, 2, and 3), but I have been a bit underwhelmed by the response. I had been hoping for some input from other published authors,…
Blogs, as Carl Zimmer astutely noted at this year's ScienceOnline conference, are software. Despite all the hand-wringing over whether science bloggers can or should replace science journalists the fact of the matter is that science blogs are the independent expressions of a variety of writers…
Over at the Inverse Square blog author Tom Levenson has just started a multi-part blog series on the evolution of his forthcoming title Newton and the Counterfeiter. It is an extension of a session on writing a pop-sci book he lead with Dave Munger at ScienceOnline'09 last January, and the posts…

This is such a great idea. I've had an idea for a book for a while now, only I've been putting it off until I finish grad school. It'll be great knowing more of what to expect from the entire process.

Looking forward to this.

By Stevo Darkly (not verified) on 09 Mar 2010 #permalink

Having read both those books and also hosting David and Michael on my blog I am very much looking forward to this discussion. Great idea.