Another cool Cambrian critter

i-29fb5e68c35b4694f9147ff5e0cda697-hurdia.jpg


An artist's restoration of Hurdia. From the Science paper.


ResearchBlogging.orgIt is not easy working on Cambrian fossils. The petrified treasures are found in only a few places in the world, and even though many exhibit exquisite preservation they come from a time when life on earth would have looked very unfamiliar. One such creature, Anomalocaris, was a three foot long invertebrate that swam by undulating a series of lobes on either side of its body. In front of its mouth were two spiked tendrils that may have helped situate prey items to be processed by its conveyor belt of crushing plates that was its mouth. There is nothing quite like it alive today.

Indeed, Anomalocaris was so unusual that it was misidentified multiple times. Parts of it were taken as representing jellyfish, crustaceans, or other strange Cambrian creatures. Now we known differently, but similar problems still affect other Cambrian fossils. In the book Wonderful Life the late paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould wrote that "Three genera (Hurdia, Tuzoia, and Carnarvonia) are bivalved arthropod carapaces with no soft parts preserved; they cannot be properly allocated to any arthropod subgroup, and remain unclassified today." Twenty years later Tuzoia and Carnarvonia remain mysterious, but in the journal Science a team a researchers has just revealed a new identity for Hurdia.

Admittedly I am a little late to the game on this one (see what others have had to say at Ediacaran, The Dragon's Tales, and Deep Sea News), but it is hard to resist talking about such a strange creature. It has a story as complex as, and entwined with, that of Anomalocaris.

As Allison Daley and colleagues note, Hurdia has had a complex history. Parts of it were identified as belonging to jellyfish and various hard-shelled invertebrates, but during the major revisions that occurred during the 1980's these parts were assigned to two particular genera: Anomalocaris and Laggania. This placed the pieces of Hurdia in the right ballpark, but it was not until the 1990's that Desmond Collins saw that Hurdia deserved its own genus designation. A reinvestigation of the material relating to all three genera has supported this conclusion and given us an image of a creature even stranger than Anomalocaris.

Generally speaking Hurdia looked a lot like Anomalocaris. Being close relatives they shared a common body plan with anterior tendrils, stalked eyes, and a trash-compactor-of-doom type mouth. A major feature that made Hurdia distinct, though, was a large head shield that stuck out in front of its eyes. These shields were a little over three inches long, making up for about half the body length of the entire animal.

i-aca3d1efb3382d69b768e85b27938cd2-hurdiaplace.jpg


The systematic placement of Hurdia. From the Science paper.


Hurdia has also provided increased insight into the place of creatures like Anomalocaris among invertebrates. Together Hurdia, Anomalocaris, and Laggania belong to a group called Radiodonta, and this group is placed close to the Euarthropoda, or "true" arthropods like trilobites. This makes the members of the Radiodonta very significant to questions of arthropod origins, and the recent discovery of another Anomalocaris-relative called Schinderhannes has provided researchers with even more material to investigate. These creatures were strange enough to start with, but with each new discovery they seem get a little bit stranger.

Daley, A., Budd, G., Caron, J., Edgecombe, G., & Collins, D. (2009). The Burgess Shale Anomalocaridid Hurdia and Its Significance for Early Euarthropod Evolution Science, 323 (5921), 1597-1600 DOI: 10.1126/science.1169514

More like this

Fans of the great Cambrian predator, Anomalocaris, will be pleased to hear that a cousin lived at least until the Devonian, over 100 million years later. That makes this a fairly successful clade of great-appendage arthropods — a group characterized by a pair of very large and often spiky…
When it comes to aliens, Hollywood really does not have much imagination. Most extraterrestrials that have appeared on the big screen look very much like us, or are at least some kind of four-to-six-limbed vertebrate, and this says more about out own vanity than anything else. It would be far more…
Considering the fossils of the Cambrian, the oldest fossil-bearing rocks known during his time, Charles Darwin wrote the following in the 6th edition of On the Origin of Species; ... it cannot be doubted that all the Cambrian and Silurian trilobites are descended from some on crustacean, which must…
Look with your puny camera eyes! Some new specimens of Anomalocaris, the spectacular Cambrian predator, have been discovered in South Australia. These fossils exhibit well-preserved eyes, allowing us to see that the bulbous stalked balls on their heads were actually fairly typical compound eyes,…

Ah, another drawing by the estimable Marianne Collins. If there are better drawings of this sort of beastie, I haven't seen them.

By Scott Belyea (not verified) on 10 Apr 2009 #permalink

"I can only imagine that the name of Carnarvonia has changed as that genus name is also used for a flowering plant"
There are other generic names that are used for completely different organisms. If you check out damp waste ground in the UK, for example, you may see both Prunella vulgaris (a plant) and Prunella modularis (a bird).

Thanks for the information about Hurdia.

By Richard Simons (not verified) on 10 Apr 2009 #permalink

Richard; Thank you for the reminder. I had forgotten that there can be overlap for generic names between plants and animals.

It's because these creatures are so removed from any life forms now that they're so fascinating; they truly do look like creatures from another planet. I'm glad yet another one was added to the menagerie!

By Raymond Minton (not verified) on 10 Apr 2009 #permalink

The head looks like a plow with a channel underneath to force things toward the tendrils. It would seem like it fed on things it found in the mud. Yum.

The codes that govern nomenclature in zoology (ICZN) and plants (ICBN) are non-overlapping, and noncoordinated, and thus any number of genera can (and do) exist between the two codes with the same name. If, in a world where these independant codes are dropped in favor of a single, universal code for nomenclature in all organisms, this comparability would need to be discarded. So, anyways, no name needs replacement because a plant also shares that name.

By Jaime A. Headden (not verified) on 11 Apr 2009 #permalink