Darwin overload?

There is no student of nature in all of history who is as well-documented as Charles Darwin. While the paper trail that chronicles the private thoughts of important researchers like Georges Cuvier and Richard Owen is often frustratingly thin, reading the entirety of Darwin's books, papers, and correspondence could easily become a full-time job. Beyond the importance of his ideas we celebrate Darwin because his life is open for us to examine, the story of how a young believer in Creation set sail for a journey around the world that would ultimately spark a scientific revolution. There is scarcely a more romantic narrative about the scientific journey of discovery than Darwin's, a reality that makes his accomplishments all the easier to celebrate.

Festivities will kick into high gear next year as it will be the 200th anniversary of Darwin's birth and the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, the abstract of what was to be a much longer technical work called Natural Selection. (As some historians have suggested rushing On the Origin of Species into print may have been better for getting the public interested in evolution than if Darwin had waited to complete his technical tome. The abstract was more accessible, and therefore influential, than anything that would have circulated in the scientific realm alone.) As Olivia Judson notes, however, the importance of July 1, 2008 should not be ignored for that day will mark the 150th anniversary of when the short summaries of natural selection by both Darwin and A.R. Wallace were read before the Linnean Society. I am going to write up something for the event, even though it seems as if I had just written something about how grand natural selection is. (In fact, I did for Darwin Day.).

Next year will be a big year for evolution. A slew of books about evolution will be published, the replica of the HMS Beagle will set sail, the "Year of Evolution" will continue in Philadelphia, and at least two feature motion pictures will come out featuring different aspects of Darwin's life (Evolution's Captain and Origin [previously Annie's Box]. And that's just for starters. I'm excited about many of the events, but I do have to wonder if we're going to suffer from a Darwin overload. I think the diversity of events will help keep things from being too repetitive, but I do hope that there will be events focusing on how our understanding of evolution has changed since Darwin's time, too. If we concentrate too much on Darwin it may appear that the state of evolutionary science is stuck in the 19th century, something that is certainly not true.

I don't think there is much to worry about, and I am definitely looking forward to scientists taking a more active role in engaging the public about what evolution is and why it is important. We shouldn't have to wait for an anniversary of an event to do it, but it would be foolish not to take advantage of the global events that will be occurring to celebrate Darwin's work and how much we've learned since. If I'm lucky I might be making my own contribution to the festivities in the form of my book, but even if not I'm still looking forward to seeing what comes of all the evolution-related events of 2009.

More like this

Get out and celebrate the 200th anniversary of the birth of one of the most important scientists of all time, Charles Darwin, and the 150th anniversary of the publication of one of the most important books in biology, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of…
There has been an awful lot of hand-wringing going on over Charles Darwin lately. Some have picked up a long-running meme and proclaim "One hundred fifty years without Darwin is too long!" while others declare that we should kill every Darwin we meet. Just as every American president must "Get…
From his instance that human evolution has halted to his rather crummy review of Stephen Jay Gould: Reflections on His View of Life (see my thoughts on the book here), Steve Jones has been raising the hackles of his colleagues more than usual lately. Given that I am not a scientist I cannot count…
149 years ago today, Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection was released to the public. It was instantly sold out. For a "secret" formulation of a mechanism by which evolution could occur, there certainly was a lot of excitement about it, even if On the Origin was…

Eep.

I could envision a film about evolution called "Bush of Life," but it doesn't have quite the same ring to it.

In my opinion, the overweening Darwin hagiography serves mainly to feed the wackaloon creationist trope that "Darwinism" is just another religion. Sure, Darwin was a smart guy, and he was definitely in the right place at the right time to figure out the principles of common descent and natural selection. But if it wasn't Darwin, there is no question that some other bright scientist would have figured those things out soon enough.

... the importance of July 1, 2008 should not be ignored for that day will mark the 150th anniversary of when the short summaries of natural selection by both Darwin and A.R. Wallace were read before the Linnean Society. I am going to write up something for the event ...

Arrgh! I was planning that too. Now I'll have to work extra hard not to be too embarassed. ;-)

But you picked a great day to announce it, this being the 150th anniversary of Darwin receiving the Ternate Paper and all ...