Let's make a date for a debate

America is a strange country indeed; we want to know about what our future leaders are going to do about the economy, terrorism, and various social issues, but we don't ask that they be scientifically literate. In the ever-growing mass of debates held this year, it was even revealed that a number of republican candidates do not accept one of the most fundamental concepts in biology, and while liberal candidates often pay lip service to the threat of global climate change (and potential partial solutions in alternative energy sources), they have not demonstrated a firm grasp on science to date, either. While most of us are tired of debates by now, there is one kind of debate that is vastly important that has not been held; a Science Debate. Scientists and concerned citizens are signing up in support of setting up a forum in which potential presidential candidates can share their views on important scientific issues that not only affect every American citizen, but also the world and everything on it (i.e climate change). There has never been a more important time than now than to demand that the elected leader of this country be scientifically literate and well-informed, so please sign up in support of the Science Debate.

[See this Wall St. Journal op-ed from Lawrence Krauss, which directly addresses this issue.]

More like this

While Sheril is riling up the geeks, I thought I'd provide the first of what I'm sure will be many updates this week on the ScienceDebate2008 endeavor. There's immensely heartening news, anywhere you look. The op-ed by myself and Lawrence Krauss announcing this project has now appeared in major…
We must adapt to the fact that over the last few decades it has become critical that our politicians and policymakers understand science and implement policy that is consistent with scientific facts. And it is past time that we made science enough of a priority to merit a presidential debate on…
Aside from the climate blogosphere, Paul Krugman's "Conscience of a Liberal" is my most regular blog visit.  He does not usually have a lot to say on climate change (which is mildly disappointing) and I have seen only very shallow and casual dismissals of the, to me compelling, notion that…
A long list of science community luminaries, including Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum of our own Intersection, are trying to organize the first ever presidential candidate debate on matters scientific and technological. This would be a good thing. Science Debate 2008 is at this point just a…

Gaah! Not you, too, Laelaps!

I thought you at least might be smart enough to realize that these are 'position statements', not 'debates'. I am disappointed and terrified to find otherwise.

By Caledonian (not verified) on 10 Dec 2007 #permalink