Faith trumps science. Again

By hrynyshyn on April 8, 2008.

The idea of holding a presidential candidates debate on the role of science in running the country was always a long shot. But those behind Science Debate 2008 must be crying in their coffees this morning with the news that Clinton and Obama have agreed to a CNN-televised forum a week from Sunday on -- wait for it -- "faith, values and other current issues."

I suppose if we're really lucky the moderators will buy Al Gore's argument that climate change is a moral issue, as is stell cell research, energy independence, the teaching of evolution.... But we all know that's not where this thing is going. It's organized by a group that never got the memo on the First Amendment and Jefferson's Wall: Faith in Public Life, which describes the forum as "a chance for Obama and Clinton to talk about how faith, scripture and public policy all come together."

The thing is, without McCain's participation (he's got a "scheduling conflict") I can't really see the point, even for those that do want to see the Ten Commandments adorn the wall of every courtroom.

Tags
religiosity

More like this

Al Gore's inconvenient crusade
I'm sure Robert Samuelson isn't the only pundit who doesn't buy Al Gore's argument that climate change is a moral issue. The Newsweek editor and Washington Post columnist weighs in on "An Inconvient Truth" today by rejecting Gore's characterization of the problem. The trouble with the global…
And yet another political roundup...
Under the fold: Ex-Cheney aide: Bush won't hit Iran: US President George W. Bush will not attack Iran to halt its nuclear weapons program before his term ends in January, David Wurmser, a key national security adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney up until last year, has told The Jerusalem Post.…
Performance Issues: Science Debate Still a Bad Idea
Bush-Gore Debates 2000: The focus was on performance rather than substance. For those that have seen the Nisbet/Mooney Speaking Science 2.0 talks over the past year, you might have witnessed during the Q&A some disagreement over the merits of actually having the presidential candidates…
And yet another political roundup...
Under the fold.... WHAT MAKES PEOPLE VOTE REPUBLICAN?: When Republicans say that Democrats "just don't get it," this is the "it" to which they refer. Conservative positions on gays, guns, god, and immigration must be understood as means to achieve one kind of morally ordered society. When Democrats…

Because for some reason Americans want the person who hears the most voices to be in charge of the world's largest nuclear arsenal...

By Jason Failes (not verified) on 08 Apr 2008 #permalink

If you look at the statistics page for that group its clear why they are more likely to be important for politicians compared to the tiny minority of the population seriously interested in science.
"The "religious left" is mobilized to vote: 69 percent voted in the 2004 presidential election, compared with 51 percent in 2000. By comparison, 69 percent of the Religious Right also voted in the 2004 presidential election.
The "religious left" accounted for 21 percent of Kerry's votes. Conversely, 26 percent of President George W. Bush's voters were members of the Religious Right."