My latest Science Progress column is a response to Seed's interview with the outgoing science adviser. All I can say is wow, Dr. Marburger, you really don't get it, and maybe you never will.
Either way, we Bush administration science critics remain entirely unimpressed with your inability to even properly characterize (much less answer) our arguments. And that wind of change that you might feel around you right now--we're part of it. You're not.
You can read the full column here.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Without holding anything back, I've tried to be respectful in my criticisms of Bush science adviser John Marburger. He's a well regarded scientist, after all. And I doubt he's responsible for any of the troublesome behavior of the administration.
But Marburger's defenses of the administration are…
Folks: Here's another old article I wrote that wasn't online. You could say this is the article that started it all...my 2001 report on how John Marburger had been marginalized in the Bush administration. We're talking old school....but at the same time, this kind of writing ultimately led to The…
Just how out of touch with science is Bush's science adviser? Ray Pierrehumbert, a University of Chicago climatologist, bring us a report on a speech by John Marburger at the current meeting of the American Geophysical Union. Unfortunately there are noreal surprises, just the usual denial.…
Janet D. Stemwedel: Hey, can we talk about pseudonymous blogging?
Dr. Free-Ride: Haven't you already written a bunch of posts about that?
Janet D. Stemwedel: Yeah, but the blogosphere seems to be discussing it again.
Dr. Free-Ride: You know I only work on Fridays, right?
Janet D. Stemwedel: Get…
Surely, a case is made here and now for "branding" this woefully inadequate leadership as a confederacy of dunderheads.
Is this man on drugs? Unbelievable. Especially the last part.
Like Bush, Marburger is himself in deep denial because to admit otherwise would be to acknowledge that he failed miserably.
I'm stunned most by this quote:
"By the time I've arranged a presentation about something for the president, all science questions have been resolved. And he expects it. He would probably fire me if I permitted a science question to leak into his briefings. I'm there to make sure that his advisors and his agencies have consulted with the science community, and that all the science issues have been taken care of before anything gets to him."
I'm amazed that Marburger has been a professor and university president, if that's his view on science. Does he mean that if something wasn't a settled issue, then he wouldn't present it to the president? And further, did he really feel his job security would have been threatened if he had done so? If that's the sort of skewed advice GW was receiving, I can now better understand some of his failings.
Science is constantly evolving and is full of uncertainty. Identifying and adjusting for uncertainty is probably one of the strongest tools that science can give to politicians.
"He [Bush] would probably fire me if I permitted a science question to leak into his briefings."
Though that is undoubtedly true, I think it is revealing.
People who are more concerned about keeping their job than doing their job rarely do the job that they should.