"People around the world have always been more impressed by the power of our example than by the example of our power."
- Bill Clinton, 2008 Democratic National Convention
- Log in to post comments
More like this
John discusses an argument by Bruce Bartlett that it made sense for conservatives to support Hillary Clinton in 2008, based on the following reasoning:
Surveying the political landscape, I [Barttlett] didn't think the Republican candidate, whoever it might be, was very likely to win against whoever…
With Bill Clinton, Michelle Obama, and a zillion other people looking on, Hillary Clinton made clear her support of Obama, re-articulated key Democratic values (especially focusing on health care, education, human rights, workers rights, and the environment), Eulogized the recently dead, and kicked…
This is an excellent moment to revel in the complexity of life, and argument, and to appreciate the value of the honest conversation.
A candidate is the presumed nominee when she or he obtains the required number of pledged delegates to be at 50% plus a fraction in the total pledged delegate count…
Yesterday, Barack Obama won all three contests (Maryland, Virginia, and DC) in the "Potomac Primary", all by sizable margins. This means that he has won all eight contests that have occurred since Super Tuesday. He now leads the delegate race--even when superdelegates are included--and he…
Really? I wonder if the Tutsi would agree.
Do you have a point, Neuro-conservative? Wait, I think I see what your point is. Because Bill Clinton was president at the time and the U.S. didn't intervene in Rwanda he is being disingenuous. Is that about right? If that's your point then I can only respond with Darfur. Which is worse: To not recognize a problem until it is too late to do something about it? Or to recognize the problem and choose to do nothing about it?
I've always been more impressed by the might of the speech than by the speech of the mighty.
Conventions usually bring out the best in oratory. The line is great, and the idea behind it should be taken seriously. The reality is that Clinton and just about all of our chief executives have taken the opposite course, or none at all, when it was politically expedient.
The use of power is itself part of the example. Military power can be used to stop genocide or repel an invasion. It can also be used to prop up dictators, funnel rich contracts to war profiteers, or, as some idiot from the American Enterprise institute once proposed, to "throw a small country against the wall" just because we can. The former example says "Citizens of our country are citizens of the planet, and we will defend ourselves and other people against thugs and warlords." The latter example says "We can do whatever we want to anyone we choose, so shut up or you're next."
Do the words "Kosovo" and "Somalia" evoke something to Mr Clinton's mind?