Money Instead of Votes

American colonialism strikes again. It turns out that Sen. Mike Crapo of Idaho has received $ 39,000 in donations recently from the U.S. Virgin Islands, double what he received from his own constituents. Why do the U.S. "territories" give so much political cash? Because that's the only way they can influence our political system, lacking voting representation in Congress. It's an outrageous situation, but one that is continually perpetuated. I wrote about it for my very first article in The American Prospect, back in 2000--the story is even worse in Puerto Rico. And nobody ever talks about it.

More like this

This post isn't about science, but it is about something close to my heart. For a long time, I've been outraged over the eternally-unresolved status of U.S. territorial possessions like Puerto Rico and Guam, and over the disenfranchisement of Americans right here in Washington, D.C., who aren't…
Actually, this snake is nicer and cuter than Joe Lieberman (from here) What's remarkable in the coverage of healthcare reform is how certain bits of information simply go missing. For example, how often did you read that other developed countries with comparable standards of living can offer…
Visiting Arkansas, hanging around briefly with some people in the Real Estate business, I found a lot of hatred of Mexicans, whom they unimaginatively referred to as "spics" but making it clear they were talking about Mexicans, not some other spics. Sitting with a group of people talking about…
I am absolutely livid right now. Our Republican overlords last night slipped in a ban on all financial transactions that might be involved in internet gambling into a totally unrelated bill and got it slipped through. Lawmakers stayed up late as well, making sure to throw our country back into the…

Don't forget that Washington DC citizens are in the same postition...taxation without representation.

Unfortunately, giving them votes won't change the fact that money will always be more effective than voting. Each person only has one vote, but they can spend money to lobby based on what they have and how important it is to get their way on an issue.

Voting only decides who gets elected, and that's far too broad and coarse a control to determine the details of what they do while they're in office. Elected officials' only motivation is to do what benefits themselves and their friends the most, without doing anything that would upset enough people to endanger their chances of reelection (unless they think they can get away with it, which obviously many do). And most people don't care enough to keep track of the details of what they're doing.

The residents of the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico just don't have the illusion that they have any political influence from voting.

(BTW, had to remove my scienceblogs.com cookies to post this, due to the bogus error claiming I hadn't entered an email address.)