1. illconsidered
  2. Real Climate on latest temperature reconstruction

Real Climate on latest temperature reconstruction

By illconsidered on September 3, 2008.

Just as an addendum to this post, I wanted to point out that Real Climate has a discussion of the paper in question[PDF].

The authors include not only Mike Mann, but also Bradley and Hughes, so we have the whole infamous MBH cabal in one place again! Let the mud-slinging begin!

But some useful stuff from RC's post includes noting the substantial increase in the number of proxy data sources:

1209 back to 1800; 460 back to 1600; 59 back to 1000 AD; 36 back to 500 AD and 19 back to 1 BC (all data and code is available here). This is compared with 400 or so in MBH99, of which only 14 went back to 1000 AD.

and this:

So what does it all mean? First off, this paper (like MBH98 before it) is not an attribution study. That means that the reasons for any of the ups-and-downs in the records are not demonstrated by these papers alone. Attribution of the recent trends (as discussed in IPCC AR4) to anthropogenic effects has mostly focussed on the last 150 years and did not use any paleo-data.

which confirms what I wrote yesterday and before: the theory of anthropogenic global warming does not rest on the existence or non-existence of a globally synchronized and pronounced MWP!

Tags
other blogs
papers

More like this

The Wegman report
There is apparently a strange thing called the Wegman report. Sadly that link only contains Smokey Joe Bartons comments on selected extracts (does anyone know where the full thing is? Is it published? Also quite what the committee/panel is, is rather vague. [Update! Aha... I should have known:…
The Hockey Stick is Broken
This is just one of dozens of responses to common climate change denial arguments, which can all be found at How to Talk to a Climate Sceptic. Objection: The Hockey Stick graph, the foundation of global warming theory, has been refuted and shown to be scientifically invalid, perhaps even a fraud…
Moving Goalposts
Hockey stick wars, the story so far: McIntyre and McKitrick (M&M) first claimed that the hockey stick graph was the product of "collation errors, unjustifiable truncations of extrapolation of source data, obsolete data, geographical location errors, incorrect calculations of principal…
NRC report on hockey stick released
The NAS NRC panel on temperature reconstructions has released its report. The press release states There is sufficient evidence from tree rings, boreholes, retreating glaciers, and other "proxies" of past surface temperatures to say with a high level of confidence that the last few decades of the…