Television and movie producers currently have a good deal in Great Britain, not in small part due to stability in various markets and some funding. For example, Game of Thrones, an HBO production, is filmed in Norther Ireland with funding from the European Regional Development fund.
Both the stability and some of the funding for various productions is now at risk because of the Xenophobic whiny baby Leavers.
This may be on the smaller end of negative effects of the UK leaving the EU, but it is a microcosm of the bigger problem, and likely to get a disproportionate share of attention if The Doctor has to run, or Residue gets tossed in the trash, or other programs lose funding or find themselves operating in an environment of uncertainty.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Michael S. Teitelbaum has an editorial in Science about scientific funding that echoes a point that I have been making for a while: the issue with scientific funding is as much about volatility (bigs ups and downs) as it is total funding.
For NIH, more research funding does produce increased…
Bored with force X from outer space? Was Force F just too fuckwitted, and part 22 just too dull? Then why not play "hedge funds"? Hedge funds do lots of complex maths and make lots of money (only not so much recently); they also have the advantage of being opaque. So play today, with Jo Nova and…
Financial trading is really risky business for individuals and economies alike. Millions of pounds and dollars rest on the fast decisions of stressed people, working under extreme pressure. With such high stakes, it's worth remembering that traders, regardless of their intellect or experience,…
You may be wondering whether the recent spate of blogging about science in popular media and peer review (by the way, you should definitely read Janet's two posts on these issues) has any connection to my talk next month at the Science in the 21st Century workshop. Yes, yes it does-- I figure that…
It may also have nasty implications for science based research as well.
Yeah, but people don't care about that.
Sad but true.
Environmental regulations may be threatened.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2016/jun…
The Paris agreement may be at risk.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/06/24/ho…
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jun/25/eu-out-vote-puts-uk…
Many of the leading voices for leave are denialists.
http://www.euractiv.com/section/uk-europe/news/brexit-campaign-leadersh…
EU sponsored research would move to other countries.
On the other hand, David Cameron has secured for himself a place in (what's left of) British history.
What is it that Britain really needs to and must do concerning its political relations that it cannot do anyway in another, practically equally straight-forward, way? --provided that Parliament actually honors the wishes of the majority of voters in the so-called "Brexit" referendum