1. gregladen
  2. An Anti-Creationist Strategy

An Anti-Creationist Strategy

By gregladen on December 3, 2007.

Mike the Mad Biologist suggests this:

One way pro-science citizens can influence what local and state governments do is through federal funding. The next time any educational legislation is proposed, a key component should be the release of federal support for educational programs contingent upon the adoption of educational standards that do not accept intelligent design creationism as science and that also support the study of evolution.

It is possible. The mechanism for this is in place to some extent. There is the No Child Left Behind policy which demands certain things happen at the state level. Attempts have been made to hijack that legislation to INCLUDE creationism. Why not hijack it to EXCLUDE creationism?

This will all depend on how the next couple of elections go...

Tags
creationism

More like this

A Possible Way to Strike Back at Creationist Politicians
No, I'm not talking about voting them out of office (fat chance of that happening in some places). By now, you've probably heard about the firing of the Texas Education Agency's director of science curriculum. There's not much to add to what others have already said about how stupid this is, so,…
Houston, we have a problem: Attending to structure and process of science and science education policy [A Vote For Science]
Candidate's promises and positions do not always match what is constitutionally or procedurally possible. It is possible to wrap oneself in the Constitution and hide behind it at the same time. Several years ago, a child died when a string attached to his 'hoodie' was caught in the frame of…
Just say "no" to stupid surveys
I was not alone in receiving a silly survey from an ID creationist: Tara, Mike, John, and Wesley all got it, and all rejected its premise. I'm joining in the universal dismissal. If you're curious, I've put the "survey" below the fold, but here's my answer. A. Insert thumbs in ears. B. Flap hands…
Myers on Romney
P.Z. Myers does not agree with my take on Mitt Romney's statement regarding evolution. Now, I agree with P.Z. on about 99% of everything in life. But on this one, and on theistic evolution generally, he is way off. Let's start with his title: “Mitt Romney, theistic evolutionist...and this is…

The only reason I am against this is because it puts us at the same level as IDiots, where the scientific process is bypassed and instead the issue is left to politicians and the courts.

There are specific "no federal mandate" clauses in NCLBA. The feds very clearly state that they impose no curriculum quality standards on the states. The feds require state standards and testing, but refuse to write any federal curriculum standards.

By Reed A. Cartwright (not verified) on 03 Dec 2007 #permalink

Webs: I get your point, but keep this in mind: The fight to keep creationism out of the schools has only barely involved the simple fact that "evolutionary biology" is acceptable and creationism is not. Had there not been a First Amendment Issue there would not have been ACLU legal teams pulling our nuts out of the fire. It would be nice to win on the basis of truth, but so far we have not won anything on that basis (though it has been a factor)

Reed: Indeed, which is why I used the phrase "certain things". ... I'm pretty sure I don't want to advocate for a federal curriculum! But I might advocate for a federal rule that curriculum not violate the first amendment or any other laws of the land. Perhaps this could be snuck in along with an anti-terrorism clause of the NCLB act....