Felix Salmon pointed me to The Myth of the Rational Market: A History of Risk, Reward, and Delusion on Wall Street today. There really is a boom in these sorts of books recently! Are we overdoing the "irrationality" bit? Probably. Mike offers up some skepticism about the creeping of irrationality as an explanation for everything.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I'm reading Justin Fox's The Myth of the Rational Market: A History of Risk, Reward, and Delusion on Wall Street, which is on many "To Read" lists because of its topical relevance. I think it is especially illuminating when examined in light of another work, Toward Rational Exuberance: The…
The New York Times list of "Notable Books for 2009" has been released, which means it's time for my annual rant about how they've slighted science books. So, how did they do this year? Here are the science books on this year's list:
The Age of Entanglement: When Quantum Physics Was Reborn By…
Alan Greenspan seems to have discovered the irrationality of human nature. In his recent appearance on the Daily Show, he lamented the stubborn persistence of financial bubbles, from junk bonds to dot-com stocks to real estate. (For a thorough history of bubbles, from tulips to today, check out…
Obama Calls for 'Common Sense' on Executive Pay:
resident Obama announced on Wednesday a salary cap of $500,000 for top executives at companies that receive the largest amounts of money under the $700 billion federal bailout, calling the step an expression not only of fairness but of "basic common…
Far more trouble is caused by arguing rationally from bad premises than by arguing irrationally from good ones. And if you don't agree I'll bash you on the snoot.
There probably is some excess hoeing of the irrationality row going on, but that seems to me to be a relatively natural swing of the pendulum away from the excess of faith in human rationality which was prevalent before.In the current wave of books on irrationality it might be easy to lose the perspective that it was rational human thought which put together all of the research which exposed so much human irrationality. The current wave is fascinated with tearing down old constructs which were based on the myth of human rationality. At some point this should move toward attempts to build new models based on a more balanced view of human nature.
Is there a way of explaining a bubble in books about irrationality without positing irrationality? This stuff is deep, man.
It could be that authors and publishers see that there is a market for humans-are-irrational books and rationally decide to make them. But that still leaves consumers as irrationally obsessed with irrationality. Unless, you see believing in irrationality (or at least, talking about it and being seen reading books about it) as a rational choice...