I suggested below that though on average whites did not move toward the Democrats, regionally there might be differences. I inferred this from the fact that areas where blacks are thin on the ground in the South it looks as if John McCain did better than George W. Bush in 2004. So I compared the voting patterns of whites in the 2008 and 2004 elections; and there are regional differences.
2008 Democratic presidential white vote declined 15% or more vs. 2004
2008 Democratic presidential white vote increased 15% or more vs. 2004
2008 Democratic presidential white vote 10 pts or more below national white vote
2008 Democratic presidential white vote 10 pts or more above national white vote
Here are the raw data....
Kerry | Obama | 2008-2004 abs. | 2008-2004 rel. | Local vs. Nat. | |
National | 41 | 43 | 2 | 5% | |
Alabama | 19 | 10 | -9 | -47% | -32 |
Alaska | 33 | 32 | -1 | -3% | -10 |
Arizona | 41 | 40 | -1 | -2% | -2 |
Arkansas | 36 | 30 | -6 | -17% | -12 |
California | 47 | 52 | 5 | 11% | 10 |
Colorado | 42 | 55 | 13 | 31% | 13 |
Connecticut | 51 | 51 | 0 | 0% | 9 |
D.C. | 80 | 86 | 6 | 8% | 44 |
Delaware | 45 | 53 | 8 | 18% | 11 |
Florida | 42 | 42 | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Georgia | 23 | 23 | 0 | 0% | -19 |
Hawaii | 58 | 70 | 12 | 21% | 28 |
Idaho | 29 | 33 | 4 | 14% | -9 |
Illinois | 48 | 51 | 3 | 6% | 9 |
Indiana | 34 | 45 | 11 | 32% | 3 |
Iowa | 49 | 51 | 2 | 4% | 9 |
Kansas | 34 | 40 | 6 | 18% | -2 |
Kentucky | 35 | 36 | 1 | 3% | -6 |
Louisiana | 24 | 14 | -10 | -42% | -28 |
Maine | 53 | 58 | 5 | 9% | 16 |
Maryland | 44 | 49 | 5 | 11% | 7 |
Massachusetts | 59 | 57 | -2 | -3% | 15 |
Michigan | 44 | 51 | 7 | 16% | 9 |
Minnesota | 50 | 53 | 3 | 6% | 11 |
Mississippi | 14 | 11 | -3 | -21% | -31 |
Missouri | 42 | 42 | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Montana | 39 | 45 | 6 | 15% | 3 |
Nebraska | 33 | 39 | 6 | 18% | -3 |
Nevada | 43 | 45 | 2 | 5% | 3 |
New Hampshire | 50 | 54 | 4 | 8% | 12 |
New Jersey | 46 | 49 | 3 | 7% | 7 |
New Mexico | 43 | 42 | -1 | -2% | 0 |
New York | 49 | 52 | 3 | 6% | 10 |
North Carolina | 27 | 35 | 8 | 30% | -7 |
North Dakota | 35 | 42 | 7 | 20% | 0 |
Ohio | 44 | 46 | 2 | 5% | 4 |
Oklahoma | 29 | 29 | 0 | 0% | -13 |
Oregon | 50 | 60 | 10 | 20% | 18 |
Pennsylvania | 45 | 48 | 3 | 7% | 6 |
Rhode Island | 57 | 58 | 1 | 2% | 16 |
South Carolina | 22 | 26 | 4 | 18% | -16 |
South Dakota | 37 | 41 | 4 | 11% | -1 |
Tennessee | 34 | 34 | 0 | 0% | -8 |
Texas | 25 | 26 | 1 | 4% | -16 |
Utah | 24 | 31 | 7 | 29% | -11 |
Vermont | 58 | 68 | 10 | 17% | 26 |
Virginia | 32 | 39 | 7 | 22% | -3 |
Washington | 52 | 59 | 7 | 13% | 17 |
West Virginia | 42 | 41 | -1 | -2% | -1 |
Wisconsin | 47 | 54 | 7 | 15% | 12 |
Wyoming | 28 | 32 | 4 | 14% | -10 |
- Log in to post comments
More like this
In the post below I combined some of the Census Regions for reasons of sample size. But I decided to do this again without combining, but removing some of the questions because of small sample sizes. Again, I also limited the sample to whites between 1998-2008.
But, I added another category:…
Update: Follow up post.
This Michael Lind piece bemoaning liberal contempt for white Southerners made me want to look a bit deeper and compare interregional differences and similarities. I went into the General Social Survey and limited responses to whites only and compared by region. The regions…
A friend pointed me to a new Pew survey, Many Americans Not Dogmatic About Religion. It shows the general finding that though Americans are a religious people, they're moderately ecumenical in their practices and beliefs. I was concerned in particular though with the resurgence of supernatural…
The map to the left shows the counties which voted for Obama (blue) and McCain (red) in the 2008 election. The blue counties are part of the Black Belt, the area where blacks are a majority of the population because of the economic concentration of cotton culture during the 19th and 20th centuries…
Great maps. May I point out, though, that
1. The legend definitions are flipped.
2. I'm more impressed by Montana moving from 39% to 45% than South Carolina moving from 22% to 26%.
I'm surprised there wasn't a bigger native son swing in Illinois. You had big swings in Hawaii and Delaware.
1. The legend definitions are flipped
are you sure? can you clarify.
You write in blue: '2008 Democratic presidential white vote declined 15% or more vs. 2004' when you mean 'increased'.
Also in blue: '2008 Democratic presidential white vote 10 pts or more below national white vote', when you mean 'above'.
Anyway, thanks for crunching the numbers, I always knew that Sailer's 'affordable family formation' formula was only half the story. The other half is White Southern Identity Politics.
i think our browsers render the styles differently. what you say is blue i see in red. who else sees things like danny? i checked all my browsers.
Yeah, there's are discrepancies in the White vote in Illinois. Other tables (Race &Gender, Race & Income) it's around ~54%.
Weird. My Firefox messed it up, don't know why. On Chrome & IE it's fine.
ok, you had me really confused at first....
I vote in Illinois. I voted against Obama because I just can not vote for a Chicago machine pol for any office. Now the rest of the US will get to enjoy the benefits of the Chicago machine. Oh, joy.
I don't get it - upper map (coloring) should be pure subset of lower map. (Checked in Firefox 3 and IE 7 - both render the same for me)
Utah should not be blue in the top map (-11 shift per the table).
Michigan should be uncolored in top map.
South Carolina should be red in top as well as bottom.
VA and NC should be uncolored in top.
etc etc
Utah should not be blue in the top map (-11 shift per the table).
utah is a very red state; it's got a really low proportion of dems compared to the nation. OTOH, from that low base the % of dems increased a lot from 2004 to 2008. the top map is interested in variation (growth, decline) over time. the latter map is interested in variation across space. does that make sense, or am i missing something?
(all these data are from whites)
aargh, once again I'm an idiot. Misread your legends. Sorry.
Interesting. Taken together the two particularly suggest that Wisconsin and Colorado are flipping big time in teh socialist American hating mindset (white people overvoting for the half-african guy).
Not so surprising about Colorado, but interesting in Wisconsin - not at all long ago Milwaukee was (by some plausible index I've forgotten) the most segregated major city in the US.
I don't suppose you have similar maps for county by county? I'm interested in seeing any voting shifts by county in the south.
Being from the deep south (Birmingham) I am interested in seeing if the demographics of the deep south in anyway resemble the overall demographics of the nation. Specifically, voters in bigger cities were more likely to vote for Obama, etc., and I want to see if that trend is true in the south as well.
Naturally I would like to believe that the vote in my hometown (Birmingham) that went for Obama over McCain was helped at least somewhat by white voters though I admit it's a stretch to hope so.
My best hope is that after seeing that the world isn't going to blow up because we have a black president, the scared whites will realize they can let go of their fears. I say this as a white person living in Alabama because I've actually heard such fears voiced by seemingly rational people.
for counties, see here. for urban/rural, etc., see exit polls. for alabama, go here:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=ALP00p2
go to "vote by size of place."