Political views @ ScienceBlogs

About a year ago Tim Lambert asked ScienceBloggers to check out a political quiz and collected the responses. 29 of us responded, and below the fold I've placed two graphs which display a smoothed out frequency distribution across the two axes generated by the survey. As noted by the author of the quiz the two axes were extrapolated from the empirical variation of responses (their the first two principle components of eigenvectors). They are Left/Right and pragmatism. A more positive value represent Right and and "atheist" or "utilitarian" tendencies on each axis respectively. Remember that the author is British so the respondents and their distribution of responses would have generated an ideological scale relevant to that nation. We've doubled the number of bloggers since that original survey, I'd be curious if there's been any change (I doubt that).

i-7bb74c38fe7818f1a6e738c46a696bee-polsurvey.jpg

i-93176d1bdb95e27d92a9dd6614cdaac7-polsurvey2.jpg

Note: I simply used the average scalar value across the ranges that Tim used for each cell in his table. That is, if there were 10 individuals in the box which ranged from 2 to 4 I placed them all at "3." I was just looking for general trends.

Tags

More like this

The Center For American Progress recently released the results of a political positions survey. They asked respondents to rate their level of agreement with 40 questions on a scale of 0-10, with 0 at the 'disagree' end of the spectrum. They converted each person's responses into a numerical value…
A friend pointed to this massive collation of statistics on atheism across the world. I myself keep track of this literature and most of the values are pretty plausible, or I've seen them before (you can find The World Values Survey publications in any college library). This section caught my…
I've talked about "the breeder's equation," R = h2S, before. R = response S = selection differential h2 = narrow sense heritability For example, if you have a population where the mean phenotypic value is 100, and you select a subpopulation with a mean value of 125 to breed the next generation,…
A few months ago I reviewed a paper which examined the various complexities of interpreting signals of natural selection from recently developed genomic tests in response to the avalanche of human sequence data. In the paper, Signals of recent positive selection in a worldwide sample of human…

Fascinating. I'd love to see a comparison to the political beliefs of scientists in general - anyone know of a good study that examines this?

By Caledonian (not verified) on 18 Oct 2007 #permalink

Eh, thanks, interesting.

FWIW, I came up with L/R -3.25 pragmatism +4.75. I'm not surprised to be a bit more utilitarian (I'd be inclined to call it more consequentialist than utilitarian) than the modal science blogger (the fact that at 49 I'm presumably at least one sigma older than the mean and am a parent probably plays into that since a secular rise in pragmatism seems to be the normal result), but I'm a bit surprised that the left/right modal point is so far left.

I know that (in the US at least) among the adult population as a whole, the "social" and "economic" left/right positions tend to be highly correlated (r = .7 to .8 depending on the survey). I find among my work peers (engineers in SoCal - mostly ex-aerospace) both the traditional nerd/geek overrepresentation of the libertarian corner, but also much more decorrelated social and economic axes (maybe r < .25).

I wonder if in the sciences the same decorrelation occurs - impressions, anybody? (data would be too much to ask for).

By empiricus (not verified) on 18 Oct 2007 #permalink

I never took that poll because it seemed oriented (orientated?) toward a British audience. I had never heard of the politicians mentioned in the test.

Tried it again just now but couldn't get it to load.

Okay, finally managed to take the quiz. It actually didn't seem as regionally biased as I remember.

Here are my results:

left/right -2.6617 (-0.1602)
pragmatism +2.9994 (+0.1805)