Who da man?!?!

Via grrlscientist here is my EgoSurf result: 5715.

You can check me: .

Since this uses google I think that explains the high showing of grrlscientist and the low rank of Glenn Reynolds. I have noticed that some blogs are high driven by referrals from other blogs and others by by search engine traffic. My non-Seed weblog has always been driven by a large percentage of search engine traffic, and links come in from diverse sources (online class syllabii for example). More political blogs might be deriving their traffic from a tighter circle of sites and so don't come up as high as they should. Additionally, commentary on political topics doesn't tend to be highly relevant to google searchers in the long run, so an old post on a science blog might be far more interesting than an old post on a political blog.

Tags

More like this

A blog is software. Importantly: a blog is free software. Everyone can use it in any way they want. If there are 100 million blogs out there, there are 100 million blogging styles and 100 million ideas what blogging "is". And anyone who dares tell others how to do it incurs the wrath of the other…
It is with great regret that I am writing this. Scienceblogs.com has been a big part of my life for four years now and it is hard to say good bye. Everything that follows is my own personal thinking and may not apply to other people, including other bloggers on this platform. The new contact…
We haven't had a good navel-gazing kerfuffle around here in a while, but not to worry-- Bayblab comes to the rescue with a broadside against the current state of science blogging, as epitomized by ScienceBlogs: If you examine the elephant in the room, ScienceBlogs, the trend is maintained: politics…
As you may know, I love the Journal of Science Communication. It publishes some very interesting and useful scholarly articles on a wide array of issues pertaining to the communication, education and publishing of science. I wish more science bloggers (and non-blogging scientists) read it and…

hrm. i liked my pigeon hypothesis better, even if your explanation makes more sense.

I win: 13074!

Actually, it seems to depend mostly on how unusual your name is. I think the algorithm is this: They search for your name on Google, and see how many of the results point to your web site.

Well, since my original comment has failed to appear after ~24 hours, I will try to reconstruct it:

I get 13175! I think the biggest factor is the uniqueness of your name, which is why "Glenn Reynolds" scores so low. My guess at the algorithm: It does a Google search on your name, and your score depends on how many of the results point to your URL.