Rob Skipper has a relatively accessible post on what Fisher and others think the Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection means. The old joke has it that it's neither fundamental nor a theorem, but Rob goes into more detail based on a seminar he and his students did.
One thing - "genic variance" is undefined. As I understand it, that is the amount of phenotypic variation in a population that is due to genetic differences between individuals. Thats the definition I could find, anyway.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
It's been nearly a month since I last posted on The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. I've been holding off because I didn't know how to approach chapter 2, in many ways it is the most important and ambitious chapter (though not technically the most taxing). I think I will likely post twice…
As a follow up to my post below, here is a comment over at Uncertain Principles:
Being a lowly biologist myself, I will just note that there is a long tradition of physicists making important contributions in biology (Schroedinger, Pauling), but I can't think of any reverse cases -- that is,…
One issue that has cropped up in the comments a few times here is a conflation between quantitative & population genetics. Though people seem to think they're interchangeable terms, they're distinct fields. That's why population genetics text books have chapters devoted specifically to…
Science isn't perfect, it often misses obvious truths. Consider the 2005 Nobel in medicine, awarded for the work of Barry Marshall and J. Robin Warren in establishing the connection between Helicobacter pylori and ulcers. After the fact you hear many stories of doctors who had stumbled onto the…
I'll admit I generally assume people know enough biology to follow my posts. (It's my research notebook, after all, not my text book.) At any rate, Fisher's 'genic variance' is sort of defined in the paragraph I quote by Edwards as the 'additive genetic variance'. Of course, I'll give you that that's not defined. But I wouldn't use the definition you give. Here's one: it's the genetic variance associated with the average effects of substituting one allele for another in isolation of genetic context.
That definition makes things clearer, at least as long as you know what to make of average effects and allele substitutions in isolation. Not an easy task since there's no biologically "real" measure of such.
Those who do not know much biology, in this case me, don't understand the difference between additive variance and, well, whatever it is that is not additive (linked? epistatic?) and need some hand holding here. Do it nicely, and I'll add it to the Basic Concepts series list.
The non-additive genetic variance can be dominance or epistatic variance (and epistatic can be divided into additive by additive, additive be dominance etc.).
Bruce Walsh has a lot of his lecture notes on the web, which might be of help. Although just the idea of writing a Basic Concepts article on dominance variance makes me want to weep.
Bob