One of the more famous events in the development of evolutionary biology was the shift from the linear notion of horse evolution proposed by E. D. Cope O. C. Marsh and T. H. Huxley in the 19th century to the "bushy" model of horse evolution in the middle of the 20th. But not all branches of the bush were found.
Now, an eight year old boy fossil hunting with his parents in California Nevada has found some crucial fossils of small three toed horse ancestors. I hope he ends up doing more of this...
UPDATE: Josh Rosenau has a corrected and expanded post on this. He actually asked an expert, which runs counter to the Basic Philosophy of Blogging...
- Log in to post comments
More like this
During his 1876 tour of the United States, the famed anatomist and popularizer of science Thomas Henry Huxley stopped to see the American paleontologist O.C. Marsh at Yale. Marsh provided his esteemed guest with access to his ever-growing stores in the Peabody Museum, showing Huxley toothed…
A visual summary of horse evolution published in 1921 (derived from an earlier diagram by W.D. Matthew). From An Introduction to the Study of Fossils.
When Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection in 1859 he faced a substantial problem. His evolutionary…
The display of horse evolution at the AMNH as created by W.D. Matthew. Price reproduced this illustration without permission in his creationist textbook The New Geology.
The 1925 Scopes "Monkey Trial" put scientists on the defensive. It did not matter that the defendant in the famous case, John…
Probing the origins of humanity is actually a lot like being a dentist. The bones of our hominid ancestors tend to fall apart, leaving behind a smattering of shards. But teeth, made of enamel, can do a better job of withstanding the ravages of time. And teeth--particularly those of mammals--are not…
Sorry to quibble on your parade, but wasn't it O.C. Marsh and Huxley who respectively originated and endorsed the linear model?
It may have been Marsh (I'll not be able to check for two days) but Huxley was taken by the views of whichever one he visited.
Talkorigins says it was Marsh. Not that it really matters for the point of this article.
Huxley was promoting the idea of horses as having done most of their evolving in the Old World (after all that's where modern horses live, and where some of the earliest horses were found.) He visited America, Marsh showed him the American species (complete with linear pattern) and he promptly changed his mind when presented with further evidence.
Its hard to resist putting a few transitional fossils in a linear arrangement when you only have a couple of closely related extant species, and no idea for how diverse the clade was previously. Especially for 19th century workers still influenced by ideas of the "scala naturae".
I'm not clear why these remains are "crucial", and the article isn't any help there. We know quite a few genera of three-toed horses, particularly from the Miocene and Pliocene -- or so I thought.
Though I'd be delighted and proud to find ancient horse remains, too. :-)