Nomenclator Zoologicus online

Every taxonomist has to check before they name a genus that the name hasn't been used before, or that their own taxon isn't a synonym of some previously named group. Eliminating synonyms is a complex task, involving a slew of literature from the 1758 edition of Linnaeus' Systema Naturae to the modern era. So a number of reference works were published which list where a taxon name was first published. One such was the ten volume Nomenclator Zoologicus which covered the zoological nomenclature from 1758 to 1994. It is now available in electronic format online, in a database format that can be accessed by taxonomic systems. I found out that Pan for the chimps was named by Oken in 1814, because it was considered that they shouldn't remain in Homo, with us humans, as Linnaeus had grouped them...

[Hat tip to the Dinosaur Listserv.]

More like this

In honour of Linnaeus' 300th birthday, and to rescue him from the canard that he merely applied Aristotelian logic to biology, I offer up this essay on his view of classification and species. I do not think Linnaeus was an essentialist in the Mayrian sense - he nowhere specifies that species have…
One of the problems of living at the edges of empire as I do, is that often you want to have access to older books that are hard to come by. Anything from about 1870 is pretty easy to get, but if you want to access older material, it gets troublesome. Some of it is only available on microfilm or…
I'm sure by now you've heard of the ginormous spider web that was spun in Texas. The thing was huge -- 200 yards long -- and it was spun by multiple different species. That interspecific collaboration got Bill Poser thinking, so he blogged about it at Language Log: The web covers hundreds of…
Not Darwin. Not Lamarck. Not the Greeks. A French physicist and mathematician... Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis (1678-1759) was an interesting man. He devised what we now know as the principle of least action, and showed that the earth was flattened. Some other things he did, however,…

It's full of freakish eukaryotes - no prokaryotic genera in there at all as far as I can tell. Useless! :-)

Guess I'll have to stick with NCBI Taxonomy...

So Linnaeus got it right and someone else fucked it up. Okay, maybe Linnaeus only got it partially right. All primates should be in the same genus.

Hey, somebody has to study the freakish eukaryotes.

Linnaeus got it right, but Oken was one of those convinced, like the Lutheran Bishop who attacked Linnaeus for impiety, who thought humans were just special.

Most extinct dinosaurs are missing, too.

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 08 Sep 2006 #permalink