Another Positive Review of the BMHB!

That's the Big Monty Hall Book for those unfamiliar with the local slang. The review appeared in the May issue of The American Statistician, not freely available online, alas. The author was Michael Sherman of Texas A & M University. Here's the opening:

Jason Rosenhouse states on the last page of his book that he encountered much “incredulity” at writing a “whole book” on the “Monty Hall problem.” I confess that I was one of the incredulous upon picking up this book. After reading it, however, I have quite a different view.

And just what is this new view of which he speaks?

Rosenhouse is both entertaining and precise in his writing. He carefully makes the point that conditional probability is difficult to intuitively process, often because what is being conditioned on is not clear. The book is both informative and an entertaining journey for both those schooled in probability and those with little background in probability

Score! That last line is especially gratifying, since there were times when I was writing that I worried about having done exactly the opposite. That is, a book that was too technical for people not schooled in probability but not technical enough for those who were.

More like this

The Big Monty Hall Book is now more than three years old, but new reviews still appear occasionally. The latest one comes from the magazine Significance, published by the Royal Statistical Society. The reviewer is Tom Fanshawe, a statistician at Lancaster University in England. Alas, the review…
The Mathematical Association of America has now posted a thorough review of the Big Sudoku Book. The review is by Mark Hunacek, of Iowa State University. His verdict: This is a delightful book which I thoroughly enjoyed reading. In some sense it is hardly surprising that I would enjoy it, since…
Writing in the academic journal Metascience, philosopher Stefan Blancke has reviewed Among the Creationists. Blancke is a postdoc in the Department of Philosophy at Ghent University in Belgium. Together with fellow philosophers Maarten Boudry and Johan Braeckman, is the author of an important…
And mostly favorably, too. You might need a subscription to read the review, alas. The reviewer is Donald Granberg, a sociologist (now retired) at the University of Missouri. He published several papers on the MHP during the nineties. I liked this part of the review: The author does a…

... there were times when I was writing that I worried about having done exactly the opposite.

Couldn't you have, like, calculated the probabilities?

By Pierce R. Butler (not verified) on 12 Aug 2010 #permalink

Ah, very clever: a post that hawks your commercial products (I saw that link you embeded up there: very subliminal) under the guise of post related to the insights into human nature gained by examining an interesting mathematical riddle.

But try to keep a low profile; you don't want to be the cause yet more of your sciblings moving elsewhere.

:-)

Well, I did work in a reference to Richard Dawkins. In some circles that's all it takes to be considered strident.

MKR --

My understanding s that there will, eventually, be a paperback edition, but for now the hardcover edition continues to sell well. A paperback edition is not released until hardcover sales decline.