1. evolutionblog
  2. My Second Review

My Second Review

By jrosenhouse on May 15, 2009.

Jeffrey Shallit was kind enough to mention my book over at his blog. He writes:

A pleasant surprise arrived in the mail today: Jason Rosenhouse's new book, The Monty Hall Problem. I read a first draft of the book and found it excellent.

The second draft is even better, thanks in large part to Jeffrey's heroic proofreading efforts.

Alf van der Poorten says that the definition of a good book is that it mentions you. Under that criterion, this is a very good book indeed, as I appear on the back cover, giving the book an endorsement.

I recommend this book to anyone interested in probability.

Which provides a welcome opportunity to publicly thank Jeffrey for the endorsement.

Actually, his comment reminds me of something Michael Kinsley once said about political books. He said that any time a new book is published everyone in politics rushes out to give it a “Washington read.” That means looking your name up in the index as a measure of how important you are.

Tags
Mathematics
Politics

More like this

New Reviews of the BMHB and the BECB
The Big Monty Hall Book is now more than three years old, but new reviews still appear occasionally. The latest one comes from the magazine Significance, published by the Royal Statistical Society. The reviewer is Tom Fanshawe, a statistician at Lancaster University in England. Alas, the review…
My First Review!
Update, 10:27 pm: It turns out the book is available for sale right now! So go buy one right this very second! Don't know what that June 4 date was all about... And it's a good one! The official release date for the Big Monty Hall Book (BMHB) is June 4, but some review copies have already…
Everyone's Talking About the BECB!
As part of my one-man media blitz for my new book Among the Creationists: Dispatches From the Anti-Evolutionist Frontline, let me call your attention to a few posts. P. Z. Myers has posted a nice review.: What do you do on airplanes? I usually devour a book or two, usually something popcorny and…
The MAA Reviews the BSB
The Mathematical Association of America has now posted a thorough review of the Big Sudoku Book. The review is by Mark Hunacek, of Iowa State University. His verdict: This is a delightful book which I thoroughly enjoyed reading. In some sense it is hardly surprising that I would enjoy it, since…

"Washington read"! I love it. Its what I do with any book that covers my field (although I use Google Books to avoid having to read the whole thing) :-) I've been cited by a few, too.

In Beyond the Hoax, Alan Sokal explains that one of his guiding principles in crafting the nonsensical article which made his name a verb was David Lodge's law of academia: "It is impossible to be excessive in flattery of one's peers."

This problem is so counter intuitive (too some) that when I asked my friend about it who has a degree in statistics, he didn't believe me.

I myself have found a way to realise it though, intuitively. The original probability doesn't change. I find if you amplify it and make say 50 doors, people understand it more intutively.