Kramnik is the Champ!

Vladimir Kramnik won the four game, rapid chess, tie-break match this morning. It was a real nail-biter of an event! Game one was a blunder-filled draw. Kramnik won game two in his usual style, grinding Topalov down in a difficult, technical endgame. Topalov struck back with a win in game three, trapping Kramnik's king in the center and then annihilating him with a whirlwind attack. But Kramnik won game four in yet another technical endgame. Let us record the final moments for posterity:





Kramnik, playing white, is a pawn up in what is surely a winning endgame. But there are still technical problems to solve in breaking black's blockade of the white pawns. Topalov made things easy for his opponent by bashing out 44. ... Rxc5??, the idea being that after 45. Rxc5+ Kxb6 it is white who has to play carefully to hold the draw. But Kramnik eaisly found 45. Rb7+! which wins on the spot because of 45. ... Rxb7 46. Rxc5+ Kb6 47. axb7 and white is simply up a rook.

So Kramnik managed to win it over the board and all of Topalov's shenanigans are now moot. Kramnik is now the sole legitimate claimant to the title of World Champion. Over the board the match was one of the most exciting in recent memory. Not one of the eleven played games was a short “grandmaster draw.” The match contirbuted greatly to the theory of the Slav Defense.

As for Topalov, a lot of players have found it impossible to return to peak form after losing a match for the World Championship. Peter Leko and Nigel Short come to mind. I suspect that won't happen in Topalov's case. I think he will be among the world's elite for several years to come.

Thanks to everyone for putting up with all the chess blogging over the last few weeks.

Tags

More like this

I've gotten a bit behind in my chess match coverage. Time to remedy that! Last we saw Anand had blundered away an easily drawn endgame in Game Eight. This allowed Topalov to tie the match. Undeterred, Anand came out swinging in Game Nine. Topalov decided he had had enough of Anand's Catalan,…
Anand won game six of the big chess match. He has now won three out of the six games played (the other three ended in draws.) Kramnik will have to repeat that feat just to tie the match. Not too likely, but who knows? Playing white, Anand once again opened with the d-pawn, and as in game two the…
The final position makes a pretty picture: Topalov, playing black, whipped out a novelty in the well-trodden Meran Variation of the Semi-Slav. He managed to produce an objectively equal but materially imbalanced endgame where he had two knights against Kramnik's rook and pawn. This is just…
Two games down in the big World Chess Championship and two wins for Kramnik. But that doesn't tell the whole story. Game One saw the quiet Catalan Defense from Kramnik, an ultra-solid opening fitting Kramnik's style. He obtained a small advantage out of the opening but Topalov was never in…

Not one of the eleven played games was a short grandmaster draw. The match contirbuted greatly to the theory of the Slav Defense.

I'll say. Didn't something like 8 or 9 of the games start with 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6?

Now we need a 1. e4 Championship. :)

As for Topalov, a lot of players have found it impossible to return to peak form after losing a match for the World Championship. Peter Leko and Nigel Short come to mind. I suspect that won't happen in Topalov's case.

Hopefully he'll take a page from the wiley old master of the comeback himself, Botvinnik.

Actually, Kramnik himself had a lot to do with why Topalov never tried e4 as white. He's turned both the Berlin Variation of the Ruy Lopez, and the Petroff Defense into very effective drawingf weapons indeed. Topalov was probably right to stick to d-pawn openings, since he got some decent positions as white.

Meanwhile, earlier this year Kramnik lost as white in twenty moves to Topalov with e4. Overall Kramnik's record with e4 is much worse than his record with d4, do it is understandable that he stuck to queen pawn openings as well.

Actually, all this chess talk rekindled my interest in the game. I'll be curling up with a few good strategy books as soon as work winds down.

Scandal, false accusations, petulant replies, threats to sue -- this match had it all. Should go down in history as one of the most interesting title bouts ever.

By Chuck Morrison (not verified) on 14 Oct 2006 #permalink

Thanks to everyone for putting up with all the chess blogging over the last few weeks.

I think both sides of late in the ID discussion are tired of the topic. More fun to ponder chess. :-)

By Salvador T. Corodva (not verified) on 16 Oct 2006 #permalink

Salvador: No, not for everybody here. I'm not knocking the chess detour, but I look forward to further on-topic blogs and discussions.

~David D.G.

By David D.G. (not verified) on 16 Oct 2006 #permalink