Letters to Our Daughters.

Dr. Isis asked me to write a letter for her most excellent Letters to Our Daughters project, which she describes as follows:

When I was a graduate student, I took a physiology class in which I was given the assignment to recreate my scientific family tree. When I did, I found that my family tree is composed some brilliant scientists. But, my family tree is also composed entirely of men, plus me. The same is true of the tree from my postdoc. I have scientific fathers, grandfathers, and great-grandfathers, but no aunts, grandmothers, or mothers. As I considered my career path in science, I found myself wanting and needing the perspective of more senior women scientists.

The inspiration for my Letters to Our Daughters Project comes from my hope that we can recreate our family tree here, creating a forum where the mothers and aunts in our fields (which I hope to not limit to physiology, but that's where I'll start because that's who I know) can share their wisdom with us. I think there is a wealth of information among these successful women and I hope to use this forum to share it with young scientists who are yearning for that knowledge.

I'm actually in a somewhat weird position, in that my scientific pedigree (at least as I see it) includes quite a number of foremothers in college (and two in graduate school). And, I am blessed to have a mother whose own example inspired me as I looked toward advanced studies in chemistry.

Also, at least by the standard reckoning, I leaked out of the pipeline when I left chemistry to become a philosopher of science. So it's possible you'll want to take my advice with a grain of sodium chloride. However, philosopher or no, the fact remains that I love science.

Dear Daughters,

As you pursue an education in science, and perhaps consider a career in science, you will encounter challenges. Do not let these challenges put you off. While science can be beautiful, captivating, and deeply satisfying, it can also be hard. The people around you who seem to find it totally easy did not always (or will not always) find it so. If they did, chances are they were just skimming the surface, missing some of the scientific puzzles worth puzzling over; once you notice them, it's hard to let go of them.

Doing science is something that is learned. It is not an intrinsic quality of a person. This means that you are not allowed to decide you are bad at it if you haven't been immersed in learning it. And, if you want to learn how to do science -- and want it enough to devote your effort to it -- you can.

Understand that part of the challenge is not the mechanics of doing experiments or fieldwork, but the big gap between learning information and making new knowledge. You will need to be patient with yourself as you learn and you will have to refrain from doubting that you could be clever enough to make new knowledge. Many people less clever than you have done it.

Assume that you will need help from others (to learn strategies for devising empirical tests of hypotheses, to learn experimental techniques, to learn good ways to analyze data, to learn how to fix equipment when it breaks, to learn how to file the necessary paperwork). Don't be shy about asking for help, and don't be stingy about offering your own help to others. The building of scientific knowledge requires a community, and grown-up scientists ask for help all the time. (Sometimes they call this "networking", other times they call it "directing graduate research".)

If you can, join a research group where people cooperate and collaborate. Sharing information makes the climb up the learning curve less lonely, more fruitful, and frequently even something resembling fun. There's also a useful side effect here: you end up nurturing each other's excitement about doing science.

Make a point of taking stock on a regular basis, so you appreciate all the knowledge and skills you have gained. Of course, you'll also be keeping track of the knowledge and skills that you don't have yet, but want. (That list always seems longer, but there's nothing wrong with that. It means you're unlikely to end up with nothing to do.)

Now we get to a big issue: After you immerse yourself in learning how to do science, what about careers? Will you automatically be a scientist when you grow up? And what happens if you decide you want to be something else?

Please trust me that putting yourself out to learn how to do science -- and doing actual science as you are learning this -- is a worthy end in itself. Building understanding, even if it's just your own, is a good thing, whether or not you end up deciding to make doing science your life's work. And deciding to make something else your life's work does not undo what you've learned, nor what you've contributed to building new chunks of knowledge, nor what you may have contributed to the experiences of your colleagues climbing up the learning curve.

You can still love science and see other pursuits. Science can handle that kind of relationship, and your happiness matters.

If you decide that you want doing science to be your life's work -- if it feels like science is making a claim on your heart -- the perennial problems of the job market may present daunting challenges.

Don't give up.

If your heart is set on doing science, find a way to make it so. Pay attention to the advice your mentors and colleagues have to offer about finding a scientific career, but be ready to think out of the PI-at-an-R01-university box. There are many other situations where one can do science and be happy. (This is another one of those instances where it's good to ask for help and to share information.)

Make sure the grown-up scientists training you understand your devotion to science. Nudge them to live up to their responsibilities to create conditions where there is room for the people who are devoted to science to keep making contributions within the field, and to have their contributions valued.

If your choice is not to go forward as a researcher in the field in which you received your scientific training, keep in touch with the grown-ups who trained you. Let them know that your appreciation for science has not wavered, even if you've chosen to make different kinds of contributions. Maybe, as you're catching up with each other, you will even recognize some of the ways that the things you are doing are of value to science and scientists.

You may have a personal relationship with Science, but you will also have an important relationship with the scientific community. When this community raises you to be a grown-up scientist, you can leave home and make your own way in the world, but the connection to the community doesn't ever really go away.

May this community be a source of strength and comfort to you, whatever path you choose.

Categories

More like this

One of the interesting developments within the tribe of science is the way that blogs, email lists, and things of that ilk have made public (or at least, more public) conversations within a field that used to happen only in private. The discussions of Aetogate on the VRTPALEO list are just one…
In my earlier post, I described the feeling I had as I started my graduate training in chemistry that there was a huge pile of knowledge I would need to acquire to make the transition from science student to grown-up scientist. I should make it clear (in response to JSinger's comment that I seemed…
The most excellent Dr. Isis has launched her most excellent Letters to Our Daughters project. Isis tells us The inspiration for my Letters to Our Daughters Project comes from my hope that we can recreate our family tree here, creating a forum where the mothers and aunts in our fields (which I hope…
This post is standing in for a lecture and class discussion that would be happening today if I knew how to be in two places at once. (Welcome Phil. 133 students! Make yourselves at home in the comments, and feel free to use a pseudonym if you'd rather not comment under your real name.) The topic…

Doing science is something that is learned. It is not an intrinsic quality of a person.

This is a really important point. It does not take some sort of special genius to be a successful scientist. Science is a profession akin to others, and just as a normal degree of curiosity, intelligence, and attention to detail is sufficient for reasonable success in other professions, so it is in science.

This is a beautiful letter, Janet. Thank you for sharing this with your scientific daughters. I think you are absolutely write about the difference between the hands on "doing of science" and developing the ability to contribute to new knowledge.

This a comment from a fifty-ish guy who probably should have become a scientist. I have a very intelligent daughter who is in her mid-twenties. I hoped that she would perhaps pursue a scientific education and career. She's very pragmatic, though, and her cost/benefit analysis led her to a well-paying career tending premature babies in Portland, Oregon. She's happy and could move anywhere and find another job. Some government stimulus money perhaps could have induced her towards a scientific research career. That's one of the Fed's jobs, in my view -- to make it feasible and possible for bright young people to enter the scientific arena.

Good post, Janet!

I am a senior chemistry undergrad in the midst of applying to numerous PhD programs. After extensive research on schools, statistics, mentors and job placement....I've been excited "slash" disheartened for some time.
This letter finally made me break down and cry at my computer.
I dont even know what else to say because I am still crying... I think I just really needed that.